JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. K. Tari, the learned counsel for the Petitioner and Ms. L. Hage, the learned Additional P.P. appearing on behalf of the State.

2. None appears for the Private Respondents.

3. This is an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short ”the Code”) for quashing of the FIR dated 12/12/2019 registered vide Naharlagun P.S. Case No.201/2019 under Section 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. The Petitioner herein is an Advocate by profession. It is the case of the Petitioner that the Petitioner had been wrongly implicated in the instant case inasmuch he was not involved in any manner with the transaction which took place between the Complainant and National Service Engineering Corporation as well as its proprietor Sri Hibu Nobin.

5. Taking into consideration that the law is well settled that while exercising the jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code, the Court is to look into the FIR as it stands without any addition or subtraction and to see as to whether any offence is made out. It is under such circumstances, that this Court takes into consideration the FIR in question.

6. The allegations made in the FIR is that in the month of