Back
ROBIN PHUKAN
Dorjee Phurba Chukla, S/o. Late Phurpa Chukla – Appellant
Versus
Tashi Dorsom, S/o. Rinjin Khandu Maney – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. In this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-Shri Dorjee Phurba Chukla has put to challenge the order passed by the Umpire on 11.07.2016, and also the action of the Umpire in impleading the respondent No. 2 at the last stage of arbitration proceeding without any authority of law.
2. It is to be noted here that vide the impugned Judgment and award, dated 11.07.2016, the Umpire has decided the land dispute in favour of the respondent No. 2.
3. The factual background leading to filing of the present petition is briefly stated as under:-
Point of Law- The Arbitration Act itself gives various procedures and forums to challenge the appointment of an arbitrator. The framework clearly portrays an intention to address most of the issues w....
Not affording an opportunity to rebut claims of parties by allowing them to lead evidence either oral or documentary shall negate very foundation requirements of not only provisions but also lead to ....
The need for documentary evidence in land disputes and the jurisdiction of Civil Courts in resolving such matters.
Court may in every suit deal with the matter in controversy so far as regards the rights and interests of the parties actually before it, provided that nothing in this Section shall apply to non join....
Impleadment as part defendant in suit – Legal claim of petitioner cannot be defeated merely on the ground of delay or advance stage of proceeding of suit.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
