ROBIN PHUKAN
State of AP, Represented through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of AP, Itanagar – Appellant
Versus
Kacho Gyadi, S/o. Lt. Kafi Gyadi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. S. Tapin, learned Senior Government Advocate for the review petitioners. Also heard Mr. D. Majumdar, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. T. Gyadi, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. This application, under Chapter X of the Gauhati High Court Rules, read with Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure is preferred by the four petitioners i.e. (1) the State of Arunachal Pradesh, represented by the Chief Secretary, (2) The Secretary, District Administration Department, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, (3) Chairmancum- Deputy Commissioner of DPC dated 30.06.2020 and (4) the Deputy Commissioner, Seppa, East Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh for reviewing the Judgment and Order dated 06.12.2021, passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 12/2021 (Shri Kacho Gyadi Vs. the State of A.P & Others).
3. The factual background leading to filing of the present petition is briefly stated as under:-
Haridas Das vs. Usha Rani Banik (Smt.) and Others
Meera Bhanja v. Nirmala Kumari Choudhury
Aribam Tuleshwar Sharma v. Aribam Pishak Sharma, (1979) 4 SCC 389
Shivdeo Singh v. State of Punjab
Satyanarayan Laxminarayan Hegde v. Millikarjun Bhavanappa Tirumale
Lily Thomas vs. Union of India
Moran Mar Basselios Catholicos vs Most Rev. Mar Poulose Athanasius
Hari Vishnu Kamath vs. Ahmad Ishaque
Thungabhadra Industries Ltd. v. Govt. of A.P.
Meera Bhanja v. Nirmala Kumari Choudhury
State of West Bengal and Others vs. Kamal Sengupta and Anr.
K. Ajit Babu v. Union of India
Gopabandhu Biswal v. Krishna Chandra Mohanty
Ajit Kumar Rath v. State of Orissa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.