Back
NELSON SAILO
Marina Laltlanmawii Armed Veng South – Appellant
Versus
State of Mizoram – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. A.R Malhotra, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mrs. Linda L Fambawl, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents and Ms. Zairemsangpuii, learned CGC for the respondent Union of India.
2. By filing this writ petition under Section 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the impugned notification issued under Memo No. A. 11013/1/2010-EDN dated 22.04.2010(Annexure-4) by which, 1305 posts of Hindi Teachers under Centrally Sponsored Scheme (CSS) of financial assistance for appointment of language Teachers was created to be filled up on contract basis and co-terminus with the scheme of central funding. The break-up of the posts is 389 posts for High School Hindi Teacher and 916 posts for Middle School Hindi Teacher.
3. The facts of the case in brief is that pursuant to the creation of posts vide the impugned Notification dated 22.04.2010, the Director of School Education (respondent No.4) issued an advertisement for filling up of the posts that was created and the petitioners accordingly applied for the same. On being selected, the petitioner Nos. 1 to 375 were temporary engaged as High School Hindi Teachers under the CSS on contr
The petitioners could not be regarded as having entered into the State Education Cadre of the Government of Nagaland until the notification was issued on 02.09.2022, bringing them within the service ....
Contractual employees have no vested right to claim regularisation, and the employer is not obligated to hire them beyond the contract period if alternative arrangements can be made.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
