IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH, KOHIMA BENCH
Kakheto Sema, J.
Shri. T. Akangtemjen And Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Nagaland Represented By The Home Commissioner, Home Department And Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) 90 OF 2021
Decided On : 07-09-2022
Constitution of India,1950 – Article,14, 16 – Equality before law State shall not deny to any person equality before law or equal protection – There shall be equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters relating to employment or appointment to any office under State – Present writ petition has been filed by petitioners invoking principle of equal pay for equal work – Petitioners are all presently serving as Ex-cadre/contingency Dobashis (DBs) under establishment of Deputy Commissioner in following districts – Petitioners were appointed in between year – Petitioners are all paid a fixed amount of per month after deducting professional tax – Held, This Court accordingly directs State respondents to pay to petitioners minimum scale of pay which is paid to regular Grade DBs employed against sanction post along with arrears from date of filing of present writ petition – All exercise for carrying out directions of this Court shall be completed within a period of days from date of passing of order – Petition allowed.
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. R. Iralu, learned Sr. counsel for the petitioners assisted by Mr. L. Iralu, learned counsel and Mr. E. Thiba Phom, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents.
2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners invoking the principle of equal pay for equal work.
3. The petitioners are all presently serving as Ex-cadre/contingency Dobashis (DBs) under the establishment of the Deputy Commissioner in the following districts namely, i) Dimapur, ii) Kiphire, iii) Tuensang, iv) Zunheboto, v) Longleng & vi) Peren. The petitioners were appointed in between the year 1997 to 2014. The petitioners are all paid a fixed amount of Rs. 6940/-(Rupees Six thousand nine hundred and forty only) per month after deducting the professional tax of Rs. 110/-.
4. That the recruitment of DBs in the State is regulated by the scheme brought out in the Office Memorandum No. CNE-1/GEN/2015/154, dated 14/09/2018. The said O.M is the guideline for recruitment of Grade-III & IV employees under the District Administration in the State. Clause-2 of the O.M dated 14/09/2018 provides that 67% of the vacant posts are reserved for in-service candidates while 33% of the vacant posts are reserved for fresh candidates. The said clause describes in-service as employees who have been appointed on contract/causal/ex-cadre without sanction post. Furthermore, as per the said O.M direct recruitment to Grade-III & IV post is to be conducted by the District Level Recruitment Board (DLRB) while the regularization of in-service employees is conducted by the District Level Verification Committee (DLVC). The learned Sr. counsel for the petitioners submits that when the Ex-cadre DBs are regularized in service they are referred to as Grade-II DB and consequent thereto the DB getting fixed pay upon regularization are granted scale pay. It is also submitted that there are Ex-cadre/contingency DB who are granted scale pay which is carried forward on their regularization in service as Grade-II DB. The learned Sr. counsel however submits that the legal validity of Clause-3 of the O.M dated 14/09/2018 is under challenge in W.P.(C) No. 196(K)/2019 which is pending disposal. The learned Sr. counsel further submits that there is a Rule called the Nagaland Dobashis Service Rule, 1970 which regulates the recruitment of DBs, however since the rule has not been followed by the State, the same has become redundant and for the past 3 to 4 decades, the practice has been to first appoint persons as Ex-cadre DBs and thereafter, to regularize their service depending on seniority and existence of vacancies in accordance with the O.M dated 14/09/2018.
5. Mr. R. Iralu, learned Sr. counsel submits that the appointment of the petitioners as well as the other ex-cadre/contingency DBs has been loosely referred to as ex-cadre/contingency/adhoc/casual by the different District Administration and those DBs getting scale pay has been referred to as casual/adhoc. The learned Sr. counsel however submits that the nature of appointment of all the ex-cadre/contingency DBs whether appointed on fixed pay or scale pay is the same and they performed the same nature of work. There is however disparity in pay between the petitioners and the DBs similarly situated and the regular Grade-II DBs.
6. The learned Sr. counsel further submits that at present there are all together about 25(twenty five) ex-cadre/contingency DBs in the districts of Dimapur, Kiphire, Tuensang, Zunheboto, Longleng & Peren who are enjoying the scale pay despite the nature of appointment and the assigned works being the same as that of the petitioners. The scale pay of those ex-cadre/contingency DBs, it is submitted, is the same as that of the regular Grade-II DBs which at present is Rs. 3200-85-4900/- P.M as per the ROP of 1999, which according to the petitioners translates to around Rs. 17000/-(Rupees Seventeen thousand) per month. The learned Sr. counsel also submits that there are other ex-cadre DBs who have bee
The principle of equal pay for equal work mandates that employees performing identical duties must receive the same remuneration, regardless of their employment status.
The principle of equal pay for equal work mandates that employees performing similar duties must receive the same remuneration, regardless of their employment status.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the principle of equal pay for equal work, which applies to temporary employees and prohibits the denial of pay parity to employees performing the ....
The principle of equal pay for equal work is applicable if the work component is the same, and workers doing the same work cannot be paid less than others similarly situated.
Point of Law : Principle of “equal pay for equal work” has also been extended to temporary employees (differently described as work-charge, daily wage, casual, ad hoc, contractual, and the like)
Temporary employees performing the same duties as regular employees are entitled to minimum wages as per the equal pay principle, asserting their right to equitable treatment.
Equal pay for equal work applies to absorbed employees from merged entities performing identical duties as regulars, entitling pay scale parity, benefits, arrears despite initial lump sum irregular a....
In determining equality of functions and responsibilities, under principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’, it is necessary to keep in mind, that duties of two posts should be of equal sensitivity, and....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.