LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR, KARDAK ETE
Goutam Bindia S/o. Lt. Sukra Bindia – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Kardak Ete, J
Heard Ms. M. Barman, learned Amicus Curiae in Crl. A.(J) No. 36/2020 and Mr. N. Hasan, learned Amicus Curiae in Crl. A.(J) No. 37/2020. Also heard Ms. S. Jahan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State of Assam.
2. These two appeals have been preferred by Shri. Goutam Bindia and Gopi Binjia @ Bindia assailing the judgment and order dated 30.08.2019 passed by the Court of Sessions Judge, Tinsukia in connection with Sessions Case No. 9 (T) of 2018 whereby, both the appellants have been convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for committing the murder of Dilip Kishan and Sivaratri Karmakar and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and also to pay fine of Rs. 25,000/-each and in default of payment of the fine, both the convicts shall undergo imprisonment of 6 months.
3. The prosecution case, in a nutshell, is that on 15.08.2017 at about 11 PM, the accused Gopi Binjia @ Bindia led a mob to the house of Dilip Kishan. They suspected that Dilip Kishan and his wife Sivaratri Karmakar were practising witchcraft in the village. The mob forcibly dragged out Dilip Kishan and Sivaratri Karmakar and lynched them. On the next
Anil Phukan Vs. State of Assam reported in (1993) 3 SCC 282
Leela Ram vs. State of Haryana
Namdeo vs. State of Maharashtra reported in (2007) 14 SCC 150
Nar Singh vs State of Haryana reported in (2015) 1 SCC 496
Ratansind Dalsukhbhai Nayak vs. State of Gujarat reported in (2004) 1 SCC 64
Santosh Kumar Singh v State through CBI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.