SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Gau) 135

MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA, MALASRI NANDI
Jaheda Begum W/o Late Akhtar Hussain – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MS. B.D. SARMAH

JUDGMENT :

M. Zothankhuma, J

Heard Ms. B.D. Sarmah, Legal Aid Counsel for the appellant in Criminal Appeal (J) No. 81/2022 and Mr. D.J. Haloi, learned counsel for the appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 36/2022. Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr. J. Das appears for the State.

2. The two appellants have both been convicted vide Judgment and Order dated 12.01.2023, passed by the Court of the Addl. Sessions Judge, Bijni in Sessions Case No. 329(A)/2018, under Sections 302/34 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs. 10,000/-each, in default, to undergo Simple Imprisonment for one month.

3. The prosecution case in brief is that FIR dated 17.09.2016 was submitted by the informant (PW-1) to the effect that on 16.09.2016, when he returned home from Tulsijora Bazar at around 8.30 pm, he learnt that his grandson i.e. the appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 36/2022 had come to his house, alongwith the appellant in Criminal Appeal (J) No. 81/2022 and her husband, around 4.30 pm. For easier disposal of these appeals, the appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 36/2022 shall be referred to as ‘X’ and the appellant in Criminal Appeal(J) No. 81/2022 shall be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top