Back
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MARLI VANKUNG, J.
Nur Islam S/o Wazed Ali – Appellant
Versus
Malek Uddin Ahmed and Others – Respondents
I.A. (Civil) Nos. 3402, 3403, 3404 of 2022, C.R.P. (IO) No. 46 of 2019
Decided On : 21-02-2023
Adjournment of matter - Prayed for adjournment of matter – Held, Consent of learned counsel for petitioner has also been taken - In view of above, list this matter next week – Ordered accordingly.
ORDER :
1. Heard Mr. S. Haque, learned counsel for the respondents who has prayed for adjournment of the matter and that the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner has also been taken.
2. In view of the above, list this matter next week.
Courts may grant adjournments in exceptional circumstances, such as medical reasons, but may also set limits on future adjournments.
In the interest of justice, the court may adjourn a matter and allow the parties to exchange their pleadings before the next hearing.
Repeated adjournments aimed at delaying proceedings are unacceptable, emphasizing the need for timely resolutions in execution of decree.
The court has the inherent power to ensure compliance with its orders and can grant adjournments in the interest of justice while balancing expediency and the rights of the parties involved.
The Court has the discretion to grant adjournments and direct the Trial Court accordingly, especially in cases of counsel's indisposition.
The court recognized the necessity of adjournment due to the petitioner's death, emphasizing procedural integrity in ongoing legal matters.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
