Back
ARINDAM LODH
Manindra Tripura – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arindam Lodh, J. - Mr. Raju Datta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has sought for an adjournment for taking necessary steps since the petitioner has expired.
2. Prayer stands allowed.
3. List the matter on 03.04.2023.
The court recognized the necessity of adjournment due to the petitioner's death, emphasizing procedural integrity in ongoing legal matters.
Repeated adjournments aimed at delaying proceedings are unacceptable, emphasizing the need for timely resolutions in execution of decree.
The court may grant adjournments to ensure all parties are adequately represented and have the opportunity to file necessary legal documents.
Courts may grant adjournments in exceptional circumstances, such as medical reasons, but may also set limits on future adjournments.
The court allowed the closure of the matter due to the petitioner's demise.
The court balanced the equities by considering the diligent prosecution of the case and the need for travel, setting aside the order subject to the payment of costs and the respondent making herself ....
The court has the discretion to allow the amendment of record to bring on record the legal representatives of a deceased party, especially when there is an ongoing process of arriving at a settlement....
The Court has the discretion to grant adjournments and direct the Trial Court accordingly, especially in cases of counsel's indisposition.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
