SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Gau) 219

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Manish Choudhury, J.
Abhijit Malakar S/O. Late. Gunendra Malakar And Anr. – Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Assam Represented By The Commissioner And Secretary To The Govt. Of Assam, Panchayat And Rural Development And Ors. – Respondents
WP(C)/5721 of 2022
Decided On : 16-03-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr F Z Mazumder

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1949 – Article 226 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 468, 471, 420 – Assam State Legal Services Authority – Power of High Court to issue certain writs – Learned counsel for parties learned counsel for petitioner and having gone through statements and averments made writ petition – Writ petition instituted by the two petitioners amounts to abuse of process of Court – Held, Jurisdiction of Court not to be permitted by an unscrupulous litigant as a source for abusing process of law – Case in hand evident that writ petition filed by two petitioners is clearly misconceived amounting to an abuse of process of court as they have filed writ petition for an ulterior purpose and such petitioners cannot be permitted to go free – writ petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. F.Z. Mazumder, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. N.K. Debnath, learned Standing Counsel, Panchayat and Rural Development Department for the respondent nos. 1, 2 & 5; and Mr. C.K.S. Baruah, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent no. 3.

2. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, more particularly, the learned counsel for the petitioner and having gone through the statements and averments made in the writ petition, this Court is of the view that the instant writ petition instituted by the two petitioners amounts to abuse of the process of the Court.

3. The two petitioners had earlier instituted a writ petition, W.P.[C] no.2285/2018 seeking inter alia a direction to the respondent authorities to release forthwith an amount of Rs.95,31,386/-against materials the petitioners claimed to have supplied to the respondent authorities in connection with the MGNREGA Scheme and also for a direction to initiate an investigation through the Central Bureau of Investigation [CBI] with regard to the payments made in connection with false bills submitted by unknown persons/proprietors for supply of materials under the MGNREGA Scheme in Borkhola Development Block, Cachar and for misuse of public money thereby.

4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and having gone through the materials on record brought by the parties through their pleadings on 09.06.2022, this Court did not entertain the writ petition.

5. To have a clear view of the subject-matter raised in this instant writ petition, it appears necessary to reproduce the contents of the entire order dated 09.06.2022 passed in the writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 2285/2018 :-

    “Heard Mr. F.Z. Mazumder, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, Panchayat & Rural Development [P&RD] Department for the respondent nos. 1, 4 & 5; and Mr. N. Goswami, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent no. 2.

2. The 2 [two] petitioners have joined together to institute this writ petition seeking inter alia a direction to the respondent authorities to release forthwith an amount of Rs.95,31,386/-against the materials the petitioners claimed to have supplied to the respondent authorities in connection with the MGNREGA Scheme and also for a direction to initiate an investigation through the Central Bureau of Investigation [CBI] with regard to the payment made in connection with false bills submitted by unknown persons/proprietors for supply of materials under the MGNREGA Scheme in Borkhola Development Block, Cachar and for misuse of public money thereby.

3. The petitioner no. 1 is the proprietor of M/s Maa Kali Hardware & Suppliers whereas the petitioner no. 2 is the proprietor of M/s Laskar Hardware & Suppliers. It is the claim of the petitioners that they had supplied materials for various constructions undertaken in Borkhola Development Block, District – Cachar under the MGNREGA Scheme. According to the petitioners, after supply of materials, they had submitted the final bills against those supplied materials through bills viz. ;

Bill No.

dated

For an amount of

558

13.09.2016

Rs.1,92,874.00

559

14.09.2016

Rs.1,92,874.00

560

14.09.2016

Rs.1,93,964.00

561

15.09.2016

Rs.1,98,300.00

562

16.09.2016

Rs.1,07,720.00

735

20.09.2016

Rs.1,86,494.00

738

20.09.2016

Rs.73,320.00

62

18.09.2016

Rs.1,08,420.00

63

16.09.2016

Rs.1,08,490.00

64

17.09.2016

Rs.1,97,512.00

554

10.09.2016

Rs.1,99,494.00

555

11.09.2016

Rs.56,290.00

573

12.09.2016

Rs.52,010.00

572

13.09.2016

Rs.1,94,956.00

571

19.09.2016

Rs.1,94,956.00

752

19.09.2016

Rs.1,78,200.00

754

19.09.2016

Rs.1,78,200.00

756

19.09.2016

Rs.1,58,400.00

757

19.09.2016

Rs.1,49,229.00

760

19.09.2016

Rs.1,83,

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top