IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
SANDEEP MEHTA, SOUMITRA SAIKIA, JJ.
Sri Kamran Pasha Choudhury, S/o Mustafa Uddin Choudhury – Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam - Respondent
Writ Appeal No.10 of 2022
Decided on : 28-02-2023
Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 - Section 15, (1), 10(1), 6(1)(b) - Panchayat - No confidence motion - Removed as President - Petition assailing order removing him as President of 35 was dismissed by learned Single Judge – Held, As per provisions of Panchayat Act, 1994, Secretary is required to forward requisition to Anchalik Panchayat for conducting meeting and which was thereafter notified by Anchalik Panchayat and meeting was held and resolution was adopted by two-third majority of ward members - Appeal is preferred by appellant and primary grievance of appellant is that procedure prescribed under Rule of Section 15(1) has been violated by Secretary by forwarding copy of requisition for no confidence motion to Lowairpoa Anchalik Panchayat without bringing it to notice of appellant for seeking approval as mandated under law – Court find that conclusions arrived at by learned Single Judge are just and proper – Court decline to interfere with finding of learned Single Judge vide Judgment and order - Appeal dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
SOUMITRA SAIKIA, J.
This writ appeal is directed against the order dated 09.08.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P(C) No. 3333/2021. By the impugned order, the writ petition filed by the appellant assailing the order dated 18.05.2021, removing him as President of 35 no. Baghan Gaon Panchayat under Lowairpoa Anchalik Panchayat, was dismissed by the learned Single Judge.
2. The appellant was the President of 35 No. Baghan Gaon Panchayat under Lowairpoa Anchalik Panchayat in the District of Karimganj. On 22.01.2021, eight (8) members of Gaon Panchayat filed a requisition for a special meeting for no confidence motion against the appellant before the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat. It is the submission of the appellant that the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat forwarded the requisition dated 22.01.2021 to the President, Lowairpoa Anchalik Panchayat on 15.02.2021 without informing the President, of the 35 No. Baghan Gaon Panchayat namely the appellant herein. Thereafter, the President, Lowairpoa Anchalik Panchayat issued notice dated 17.02.2021 informing that 22.02.2021 was the date fixed of the meeting for no confidence motion against the appellant. In terms of the notice issued by the Lowairpoa Anchalik Panchayat, the special meeting was convened and held on 22.02.2021 whereby, no confidence motion against the appellant was moved and adopted. Thereafter, vide the order dated 15.05.2021, the appellant was removed as President of Lowairpoa Anchalik Panchayat. It is the submission of the learned counsel for the appellant that such procedure adopted by the Secretary, Lowairpoa Anchalik Panchayat and the President, Lowairpoa Anchalik Panchayat is in complete violation of the provisions of Section 15 of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 and the Rules made thereunder. Being aggrieved, the writ petition was preferred.
3. The learned Single Judge upon due consideration of the entire matter, dismissed the writ petition. Being aggrieved, the present appeal has been filed on the following grounds:
II) For that, the Hon’ble Single Judge committed error in dismissing the case only after perusal of the records at the motion stage itself without asking the respondents authorities to file the counter-affidavit, as such, the appellant/petitioner couldn’t get the chance to file his response challenging the genuineness of the records. It is submitted that the records were manipulated by the GP Secretary in connivance with the Anchalik Panchayat President and others. As such, the impugned order dated 09.08.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P(C) No. 3333/2021 is liable to be interfered with.
III) For that, the learned Single Judge wholly relied on the records produced by the counsel for the respondent authority which were in fact forged and manipulated. It is submitted that the Secretary of the G.P. never brought the requisition dated 22.01.2021 to the notice of the appellant/writ petitioner at any stage and fraudulently forwarded the same to the President of Anchalik Panchayat in gross violation of Section 15(1) of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994. As such, the impugned order is liable to be set aside.
IV) For that, the learned Single Judge failed to consider the fact that although the impugned fraudulent no-confidence resolution was adopted on 22.02.2021 removing the appellant/writ petitioner from the post of GP President, but the Deputy Commissioner, Karimganj issued the impugned order dated 18.05.2021 after about 3 months from the date of adoption of the no-confidence resolution. Such order of the Deputy Commissioner authorizing the Vice-President to act as President for indefinite period is not sustainable in law being in violation of Section 10(1) of the Assam Panchayat Act which provided that in case any vacancy arises in the office of
Section 15(1) of Panchayat Act categorically mandates that there should be service of notice of no confidence motion upon President by Secretary thereby giving him 15 clear days.
The Notice for the special meeting was found to be in violation of the statutory prescription of 3 clear days' notice as per Section 17[3] of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994.
Point of Law : Section 17 [3] of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 has clearly stipulated that in case of any special meeting [which is a meeting for no confidence motion], 3 [three] days' clear notice h....
Word ‘lost’ appearing in 2nd proviso to section 15(1), in deference to fundamental principles of statutory interpretation, has to be essentially comprehended in text and context in which it appears.
Section 15(2) of Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 which provides for giving notice to President for purpose of holding a No Confidence Motion is mandatory and non compliance of such mandatory provision and ....
Section 15 of Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 have been held to be directory and not mandatory, any resolution adopted cannot be faulted with merely because time limit prescribed under Section 15(1) have n....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.