SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 13

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Manish Choudhury, J.
Ayat Banu Begum W/o- Lt. Anowar Hussain - Appellant
Vs.
The State Of Assam And Ors - Respondent
WP(C) No. 3025 of 2022
Decided On : 05-01-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. M K Choudhury
For the Respondent: SC, P AND R.D.

The Notice for the special meeting was found to be in violation of the statutory prescription of 3 clear days' notice as per Section 17[3] of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994.

Headnote:

no confidence motion - Special Meeting - Assam Panchayat Act, 1994, Section 15, Section 17

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner contested for the post of President of 113 no. Baghmari Gaon Panchayat and was elected. A motion of no confidence was brought against the petitioner, resulting in litigation. The court set aside the resolution expressing no confidence, issued directions, and ordered a fresh special meeting. The President of the Bilasipara Gaon Panchayat issued a notice for the special meeting, which was held, and a resolution expressing no confidence was passed against the petitioner.

Finding of the Court:

The Notice for the special meeting was found to be in violation of the statutory prescription of 3 clear days' notice as per Section 17[3] of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994. The resolution and the special meeting held on 28.04.2022 were set aside and quashed. The court ordered a fresh special meeting to be held in compliance with the provisions of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994.

Issues: Compliance of provisions of Section 15 and Section 17 of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994, and the validity of the Notice for the special meeting.

Ratio Decidendi: The Notice for the special meeting was found to be in violation of the statutory prescription of 3 clear days' notice as per Section 17[3] of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994. The court ordered a fresh special meeting to be held in compliance with the provisions of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994.

Final Decision: The resolution and the special meeting held on 28.04.2022 were set aside and quashed. The court ordered a fresh special meeting to be held in compliance with the provisions of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994.

JUDGMENT :

The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been instituted by the petitioner assailing the proceedings of a Special Meeting held on 28.04.2022 in the office of Bilasipara Anchalik Panchayat Raniganj to discuss a motion of no confidence brought against the petitioner as the President of 113 no. Baghmari Gaon Panchayat under the Bilasipara Anchalik Panchayat and the Dhubri Zilla Parishad.

2. The genesis of the Special Meeting, convened on 28.04.2022, is traceable and relatable to a Requisition Notice dated 27.01.2022 submitted by 10 nos. of Ward Members of 113 no. Baghmari Gaon Panchayat expressing want of confidence against the petitioner as the President of the said Gaon Panchayat.

3. In the General Panchayat Election held in the year 2018, the petitioner contested for the post of President of 113 no. Baghmari Gaon Panchayat. In the said Election, the petitioner got elected to the post of President of 113 no. Baghmari Gaon Panchayat [hereinafter also referred to as ‘the Gaon Panchayat’, at places, for convenience] as per the provisions of Section 6[1][b] of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994, as amended. In the said General Panchayat Election, the respondent nos. 6 – 15 also got themselves elected as Ward Members of the Gaon Panchayat.

4. As the Requisition Notice dated 27.01.2022 resulted into a litigation in the form of a writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 1512/2022 earlier, it appears necessary to exposit the necessary facts brought by the same parties herein in the writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 1512/2022 to appreciate the issue involved in the present writ petition. The writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 1512/2022 was allowed by an Order dated 21.04.2022 with a number of directions. As the necessary facts mentioned in the Order dated 21.04.2022 are not in dispute, the same can be stated as follows.

4.1. On submission of the Requisition Notice dated 27.01.2022 by the 10 nos. of Ward Members of 113 no. Baghmari Gaon Panchayat, who were impleaded as respondent nos. 7 – 16 in W.P.[C] no. 1512/2022 and are also impleaded as the respondent nos. 6 – 15 in the present writ petition, before the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat, the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat on the ground that the petitioner herein as the President of the Gaon Panchayat did not give her approval to convene the Special Meeting, forwarded the matter to the President of the Bilasipara Anachalik Panchayat on 10.02.2022 for the purpose of convening the Special Meeting as per the provisions of Section 15[1] of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 by enclosing a copy of the Requisition Notice dated 27.01.2022 submitted by 10 Ward Members of the Gaon Panachayat. On receipt of the Letter dated 10.02.2022 from the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat along with Requisition Notice dated 27.01.2022, the President of the Bilasipara Anchalik Panchayat decided to convene the Special Meeting on 22.02.2022 to decide on the motion of no confidence brought against the petitioner as the President of 113 no. Baghmari Gaon Panchayat. When the Special Meeting was held on 22.02.2022 subsequent to a Notice dated 15.02.2022, the motion was found to have been passed against the petitioner as the President of 113 no. Baghmari Gaon Panchayat as out of 10 nos. of Ward Members of the Gaon Panchayat, 9 nos. of Ward Members who were present, voted in favour of the motion. As the motion expressing lack of confidence on the petitioner as the President of 113 no. Baghmari Gaon Panchayat was found to have been passed by a majority of two-third of the total number of Ward Members of the Gaon Panchayat, a resolution was passed that the petitioner stood removed from the office of the President of the Gaon Panchayat with immediate effect.

5. The present petitioner was the petitioner in the writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 1512/2022. After appearance of all the parties including the respondent nos. 7 – 16 therein, who are the respondent nos. 6 – 15 herein, the resolution relating the no confidence motion

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top