IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
MANASH RANJAN PATHAK, J.
Bhumika Das (Minor) and Others – Appellants
Versus
The Union of India and Others – Respondents
W.P. (C) Nos. 6653, 7332 of 2022
Decided On : 30-03-2023
Constitution of India,1950 - Articles 14 and 16 - Admission - Selection Test - Petitioner appeared in Selection Test-2022 for her admission in Class-VI, District for Session 2022-23 - It is stated that though her name figured in select list, was called for verification of testimonials and other relevant documents, pursuant to which she appeared and submitted all relevant testimonials and documents, but Principal of said did not allow her to take admission in Class-VI on ground that she is a repeater in admission tests for her admission to Class-VI - Petitioners stated that relying on Clause 4.7 of Scheme as provided in Prospectus for Selection Test for 2022 for admission to Class-VI as formulated by that stipulates – Held, Court is also of view that such separation or segregation, with object behind, has a rational basis that is reasonable, logical and not discriminatory, since talented candidates of district concerned who appears in such selection test for their admission in JNVs, mostly from rural area, will not able to stand before other talented candidates of same district who earlier appeared in such selection test for more than one occasion or as repeaters for their admission in JNVs as they will march over first timer talented candidates of respective district – Court found that such claim of petitioners is not tenable in law - Writ petitions stands dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
MANASH RANJAN PATHAK, J.
1. In both the writ petitions, heard Mr. M.U. Mondal, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. G. Pegu, learned Central Government Counsel for the respondent No. 1. Also heard Ms. R.S. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti for the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 and Ms. D. Das Barman, learned Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent No. 5.
2. As the issues involved in both the matters are identical, the Court decided to take up the matters together for consideration.
3. In W.P. (C) No. 6653/2022, the petitioner appeared in the Selection Test-2022 for her admission in Class-VI at Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Alomganj, District-Dhubri for the Session 2022-23. It is stated that though her name figured in the select list, was called for verification of testimonials and other relevant documents, pursuant to which she appeared and submitted all the relevant testimonials and documents, but the Principal of the said Vidyalaya did not allow her to take admission in Class-VI on the ground that she is a repeater in admission tests for her admission to Class-VI at Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya.
4. In W.P. (C) No. 7332/2022 the petitioners appeared in the Selection Test-2022 for their admission in Class-VI at Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Bongaigaon, District-Bongaigaon for the Session 2022-23. Though their names figured in the select list and were called for verification of their testimonials and other relevant documents and inspite of producing all the required documents, but the Principal of said Vidyalaya did not allow them to take admission in Class-VI on the ground that they are repeaters in admission tests for their admission to Class-VI at Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya.
5. Petitioners stated that relying on Clause 4.7 of the Navodaya Vidyalaya Scheme as provided in the Prospectus for Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Selection Test for 2022 (JNVST 2022, in short) for admission to Class-VI as formulated by Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti (NVS in short) that stipulates as “No candidate is eligible to appear in the Selection Test for the second time, under any circumstances” the Principals of those two Vidyalayas did not allow them to take admission.
6. Indicating 13 such candidates, i.e. Arifa Yesmin, Shahinur Islam, Masud Hassan, Arif Rayhan Khan, Fardin Hussain Mondal, Moonjit Brahma, Ashiqul Habib, Hafizul Islam, Sanom Fariha Ahmed, Almina Sultana, Mehedi Hassan Ahmed, Hasibur Islam and Daisy Ray of Bongaigaon, the petitioners have alleged that many such students who passed admission test on their second or third attempts, have been allowed to take admission in Class-VI in JNVs, whereas, their admission have been rejected on the ground of Clause 4.7 of said Navodaya Vidyalaya Scheme, which is in gross violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
7. Hence by filing these writ petitions the petitioners have prayed to set aside and quash the said Clause 4.7 stipulated in the Prospectus for Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Selection Test for 2022 Scheme as arbitrary, mala-fide, discriminatory, unfair, unjust, improper, bias and ultra-vires, being in violation of the provisions of Articles 14, 16, 19 and 21 (A) of the constitution of India and without authority of law as well as against the new Scheme of New Education Policy of Government of India.
8. Petitioners have also prayed for issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities of the JNV to admit them in Class-VI at JNV, Alomganj PT-IX, District-Dhubri and at JNV Bongaigaon, District-Bongaigaon, respectively, for the Session 2022-23.
9. The petitioners herein are minors and are represented by their natural guardians either by father or mother.
10. The petitioners read upto Class-V and left it in March 2022 on completion of their Class-V. The petitioner of W.P. (C) No. 6653/2022 being eligible to get admission in JNVs Alomganj in Class-VI for the Session 2022-23 submitted her online application form to appear in the inte
Assn. of Industrial Electricity Users vs. State of A.P. (2002) 3 SCC 711
DDA vs. Joint Action Committee, Allottee of SFS Flats
Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education vs. Paritosh Bhupeshkumar Sheth
The main legal point established in the judgment is that false information provided in the admission forms was not deliberately given to get any undeserved benefits, rather it was given either by the....
Altering admission criteria during an ongoing selection process violates established principles of fairness and Article 16 rights, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to initially published rules.
The obligation of the Government to provide equal opportunity to all its citizens for education and admission to educational institutions, ensuring fairness and equality in educational policies.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the denial of admission to the petitioners was unjustified and not supported by the provisions of Sec. 15 of the Act of 2009, which guarantees....
The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 guarantees every child's right to education, and administrative decisions regarding admission must be based on clear and justifiable g....
Eligibility for admission to Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas requires candidates to be residents of the district where the JNV is located and to have studied class V in that district.
Eligibility for admission to Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas requires candidates to be residents of the district where the JNV is located and to have studied class V in the same district.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the applicability of reservation to Other Backward Classes (OBC) candidates in Central Educational Institutions, as provided under the Central Educ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.