Back
MALASRI NANDI
Nilufa Khatun W/o Jahidul Islam – Appellant
Versus
Jahidul Islam, S/o Iman Ali – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. R. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. N. Uddin, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. The petitioner being the wife of the respondent filed an application under Section 24 of CPC for transfer of a case being No. T.S.(M) F.C.(Civil)/1139/2022 pending before the Principal Judge, Kamrup(M) at Guwahat to the Principal Judge, Family Court, Barpeta.
3. The case of the petitioner is that her marriage was solemnized with the respondent in the year 2014 as per Muslim Rites and Rituals. After their marriage, they lived together as husband and wife and out their wedlock two children were born. It is alleged that after birth of second child of the petitioner, the respondent demanded an amount of Rs.1 lakh as dowry and at the instigation of his parents, started to quarrel with her on some petty issues. When the petitioner refused to fulfill his demand, the respondent along with his family members started to torture her both physically as well as mentally. Somehow, the father of the petitioner managed Rs.50,000/-which was given to the respondent. But the respondent again started to torture her for remaining amount i.e. Rs.50,000/-. The father of the petiti
The convenience of the wife in matrimonial matters is a relevant consideration for transfer petitions, and transfer should be based on sufficiently cogent grounds and the balance of convenience of th....
In matrimonial cases, the convenience of the wife is a paramount consideration in transfer applications under Section 24 of CPC.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
