SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Gau) 532

KALYAN RAI SURANA
Junu Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR.R PHUKAN

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. M. Nath, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. A. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P.(C) 4803/2016, Mr. U.K. Nair, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. R. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P.(C) 4729/2016, W.P.(C) 4730/2016, and W.P.(C) 4489/2017. Also heard Mr. K. Gogoi, learned standing counsel for the Higher Education Department, representing respondent nos. 1 and 3 and Mr. A.

Khanikar, learned standing counsel for the N.C. Hills Autonomous Council, representing respondent nos. 2, 4 and 5.

2. By filing these writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners, who are currently working as Assistant Professors in Maibong Degree College have prayed for (i) setting aside and quashing the Office Memorandum (OM for short) dated 10.07.2015 issued by the Addl. Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Education (Higher) Department; (ii) setting aside and quashing the letter dated 29.03.2016 by the respondent no.4 in so far it concerns the petitioners; and (iii) for directing the respondents to pay the annual increment to the petitioners including the selection grade pay.

Case of the petitioners and submis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top