Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR, J
Janapareddy Laxmi – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners claim ownership (Para 2) |
| 2. counsel argues for registration (Para 3) |
| 3. court discusses registration procedures (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's reasoning on registration (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. writ petition dismissed (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
ORDER :
This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer:
2. Facts rising to file this writ petition are that the petitioner No.1 claims to be the owner and possessor of Flat No.12, on the First Floor “B” Block in the building admeasuring 1000 Sq.feet of Built up area (including common areas), together with proportionate undivided share of land admeasuring 15 Sq.Yards or 12.54 Sq.Meters (out of a total extent of 9,277 Square yards), in Survey No.73, Situated at Archana Enclave, East Marredpally, under the limits of the Secunderabad Cantonment Board, Telanagana State, having acquired the same through registered sale deed dated 21.10.1994. Petitioner No.1 would further submit that he with an intention to sell the subject property to petitioner Nos.2 and 3 had executed a sale deed duly enclosing all the necessary link documents had approached the respondent No.3 for registration of the subject doc
A writ of mandamus cannot be issued without evidence of a demand for registration and subsequent refusal; misleading statements in affidavits can lead to dismissal.
A writ of mandamus cannot be issued without evidence of a demand for registration being met with refusal, and parties must follow the procedure outlined in the Registration Act.
A petitioner must comply with statutory requirements for document registration, and failure to provide evidence of proper presentation can lead to dismissal of the writ petition.
A writ of mandamus requires evidence of a demand for public duty performance and refusal; without this, the petition cannot succeed.
A petitioner must comply with mandatory registration procedures, including presenting executed documents, to seek relief in writ jurisdiction.
A party must present documents for registration as per the Registration Act, and failure to do so negates claims of wrongful refusal.
A writ of mandamus cannot be issued unless there is a clear demand for action by the authority and a refusal to perform a mandatory duty, which was not established in this case.
The Registering Officer must verify original documents for property registration to prevent fraud, and parties claiming rights must establish their claims before a competent court.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
