MANISH CHOUDHURY
Maruti Timber and Furniture’s, A Proprietorship Concern, Represented by its Power of Attorney Holder, Sri Partha Pratim Gogoi, S/o Sri Jatin Gogoi – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Both the two writ petitions – W.P.[C] no. 3198/2021 & W.P.[C] no. 3228/2021 -have been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India making inter alia assailment of a show cause notice dated 16.06.2021 issued by an officer in the respondent Forest Department in the rank of Forester – I [the respondent no. 5] who is the Investigating Officer of a forest offence, registered as case no. WR/16/2021, on 14.06.2021, purportedly in the capacity of the Authorised Officer under the Assam Forest Regulation, 1891, as amended.
2. The case of the petitioner in the writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 3198/2021 is that the petitioner firm, a proprietorship concern, is engaged in the business of buying and selling of Non-Timber Forest produce and furniture products. The petitioner in the writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 3228/2021 is the owner of a vehicle bearing registration no. UP-25/CT-7676 [Truck] [hereinafter referred to as ‘the subject-vehicle’, for short].
3. By the impugned show cause notice dated 16.06.2021, the petitioner in the writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 3228/2021 was called upo
Coal India Ltd. vs. Ananta Saha
Harbanslal Sahnia & another vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & others
Kalabharati Advertising vs. Hemant Vimalnath Narichania
M.P. State Agro Industries Development Corporation Ltd. vs. Jahan Khan
State of H.P. vs. Gujarat Ambuja Cement Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.