SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 648

ORISSA HIGH COURT
SATYA SWARUP PATTANAIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Sanjeeb K Panigrahi, J.

1. The petitioner, in the present Writ Petition, challenges the legality and propriety of the impugned judgment dated 23.09.2025 passed by the learned District Judge, Ganjam, Berhampur in F.A.O. No.1 of 2025.

I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE:

2. Succinctly put, the facts of the case are as follows:

(i) On 06.02.2022, at about 4.30 PM, the complainant, Prasant Kumar Karjee, Forester, Khalikote, while on patrolling duty along with Manoj Sethi, Forest Guard, and Babi Pallei of the Forest Protection Squad, intercepted a white-coloured Bolero Pick-up bearing Registration No. OD-33AD-8793 on National Highway No. 16 near Kespur Market on suspicion.

(ii) Upon inspection, the vehicle was found to be carrying ten Sisoo logs along with one Palo and rope. The driver of the vehicle, namely Nabin Mistri, failed to produce any valid documents authorising transportation of the said forest produce. Consequently, the vehicle along with the Sisoo logs was seized, brought to the Range Office, Khalikote, and produced before the Range Officer.

(iii) Thereafter, a case was registered against the vehicle and the driver, Nabin Mistri, vide O.R. Case No. 275 of 2021-22 of Khalikote

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top