SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Anil Kumar Todi S/o Nirnjan Lal Todi – Appellant
Versus
D. N. Enterprise – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Shri S. Khound, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri G. Goswami, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 who has entered appearance on the strength of a caveat.
2. The petitioner is the defendant in the connected Money Suit No. 4/2019 and this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed against an order dated 09.05.2023 passed in the said M.S. 04/2019 by the learned Civil Judge, Darrang, Mangaldai.
3. Shri Khound, the learned counsel by drawing the attention of this Court to the impugned order dated 09.05.2023 has submitted that the prayer for adjournment of the petitioner has been rejected whereby the petitioner has been deprived of an opportunity to contest the case properly as he would not be able to cross examine the plaintiff witness no.1 and plaintiff witness no. 2. He submits that though the examination in chief was filed by way of an affidavit and copies of the said affidavits were furnished, the documents accompanying the affidavits were not furnished. It is submitted that the PW1 in the said examination has exhibited 20 nos. of documents whereas the Pw2 had exhibited 5 nos. of documents and those being voluminous
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.