Back
KARDAK ETE
Gaurav Mamik, Son Of Shri Tej Pratap Mamik – Appellant
Versus
CSA Corporation Private Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. initiation of criminal complaint (Para 4 , 5 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. details of the contractual arrangement (Para 6 , 8 , 11) |
| 4. petitioner's arguments regarding jurisdiction and lack of a criminal case (Para 12 , 13 , 17) |
| 5. witness testimonies and inquiries (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. discrepancies in witness statements (Para 18 , 19) |
| 7. judiciary's analysis of jurisdiction in criminal matters (Para 22 , 24 , 25) |
| 8. nature of applicable legal principles for quashing criminal proceedings (Para 28 , 30 , 32) |
| 9. legal observations related to the nature of dispute and grounds for quashing the complaint (Para 60 , 61 , 72 , 75 , 76) |
| 10. final conclusion and order of quashing (Para 79 , 80) |
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. Dhanesh Relan, learned counsel for the petitioner assisted by Mr. Arindam Dey and Mr. Joshua Sheqi, learned counsels. Also heard Mr. T. B. Jamir, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 and Mr. V. Zhimomi, learned Public Prosecutor for respondent No. 2.
2. The present case has been instituted under Section 482 , Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) by the petitioner praying for quashing of the complaint case being CR Case No. 12/2021 under S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
