ROBIN PHUKAN
Rajo Natung, S/o Late Tagam Natung – Appellant
Versus
State Of AP, To Be Represented By The Commissioner And Secretary To The Govt Of AP, RWD, Itanagar, AP. – Respondent
JUDGEMENT AND ORDER :
Heard Mr. A. Kashyap, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. G. Ete, learned Addl. Senior Govt. Advocate, for the State respondent Nos.2 & 3 and Mr. G. Tarak, learned standing counsel for the respondent Nos.1, 4, 5 & 6.
2. Four petitioners have approached this Court by filing the present petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the e-procurement Notice, dated 22.06.2020, issued by the Executive Engineer/PIU, Pakke-Kessang for construction/up- gradation of roads from 27.00 KM of Sede to Pijiriang, under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana –II (herein after PMGSY-II, Up gradation) and maintenance thereof, for five years, along with BID documents available from 23.06.2020, and to direct the respondent authorities to pay their land compensation as per the provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency as per the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and to pass appropriate order or directions, as the Court deem fit and proper to grant adequate relief to the petitioners, for the ends of justice.
3. The background facts, leading to filing of the present petition are adumbrated here in below:-
Lalaram and Ors. vs. Jaipur Development Authority and Ors. reported in (2016) SCC 31
Babu Verghese and Ors. vs. Bar Council of Kerala and Ors. reported in (1999) 3 SCC 422
N.G. Projects Ltd. v. Vinod Kumar Jain
Uflex Ltd. vs. State of T.N. reported in (2022) 1 SCC 165
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.