SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Gau) 985

DEVASHIS BARUAH
Vinayak Logistic – Appellant
Versus
Union of India Represented by Secretary, New Delhi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: M. Kalita, A.Z. Hazarika.
For the Respondents: B.N. Gogol, R. Sarma.

JUDGMENT :

DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.

1. The three writ petitions are taken up for disposal by this common judgment and order taking into account that the challenge made in the three writ petitions pertains to the Railway Board’s Circular dated 16.09.2011 whereby a designated tare weight of wagons were fixed of permissible carrying capacity.

2. The petitioner in WP (C) No. 4866/2012 is an Association of persons which is registered under the provisions of Societies Registration Act, 1860. The members of the said Association carry on the business of sale and supply of coal from different loading stations situated within the jurisdiction of N.F. Railways, Maligaon to all over India.

3. The petitioners in WP (C) No. 208/2013 are individual proprietorship firms having their offices at Goalpara and engaged in the business of sale and supply of coal from different loading stations situated within the jurisdiction of N.F. Railways, Maligaon, Guwahati including Goalpara, Jogighopa, Bongaigaon etc. to all over India.

4. The petitioners in WP (C) No. 5028/2013 are a proprietorship firms who are engag

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top