SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 386

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, SUJOY PAUL
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
S. R. Ferro Alloys – Respondent


Advocates:
H.Y. Mehta for appellants; R.S. Chhabra for respondent.

ORDER

Rafiq, C.J. --1. This writ appeal under section 2 of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyayapeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 has been filed by the appellants (hereinafter referred to as “the appellants-Railways”) assailing the order dated 6.2.2020 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No.1256/2018 (M/s S.R. Ferro Alloys vs. Union of India and others) whereby the writ petition filed by the present respondent (hereinafter referred to as “the writ petitioner”) has been allowed.

2. The respondent-writ petitioner in the aforesaid writ petition challenged the demand letter dated 15.5.2017 (Annexure P-10) and calculation sheet dated 18.5.2017 (Annexure P-12) whereby demand was made towards punitive charge for alleged overloading of loose Manganese Ore transported through Railway from Meghnagar (Madhya Pradesh) to Baraduar (Chhattisgarh).

3. According to the case set up by the writ petitioner in the memorandum of writ petition, it was a Partnership Firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. The writ petitioner-Firm was engaged in the business of mining and in that connection it has to transport loose Manganese Ore throughout the country through Railways. Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top