IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Manish Choudhury, J.
Nur Hussain - Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam And Others - Respondents
W.P.(C) No. 3417 of 2022
Decided On : 29-06-2022
Article 226 - Writ Petition - Assam Panchayat Act, 1994, Section 15 - The court discussed the provisions of Section 15 of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994, which provides for the matter of no confidence against the President and the Vice-President of the Gaon Panchayat. It emphasized the procedure for convening a special meeting and the role of the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat and the President of the Anchalik Panchayat in such matters. The court also referred to previous judgments to interpret the procedural formalities and the timeline for convening a special meeting.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged a requisition notice submitted by Ward Members to convene a special meeting to discuss a motion of no confidence against the petitioner's position as the President of a Gaon Panchayat. The petitioner contended that the requisition notice was referred without his approval and while a previous similar matter was pending for adjudication.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the requisition notice was not handled in accordance with the procedural formalities outlined in the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994. It held that the subsequent requisition notice was not barred by the previous proceeding and directed the petitioner to convene a special meeting to decide the no confidence motion.
Issues: The issues revolved around the handling of the requisition notice, the procedural formalities, and the validity of initiating a subsequent requisition notice while a similar matter was pending for adjudication.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of adhering to the procedural formalities outlined in the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994, and clarified the timeline and process for convening a special meeting to discuss a motion of no confidence.
Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the action initiated based on the requisition notice, and directed the petitioner to convene a special meeting to decide the no confidence motion.
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioner has instituted this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assailing a requisition notice submitted by the 9 [nine] nos. of Ward Members of 79 no. Kadong Gaon Panchayat on 28.04.2022 to the Secretary of the said Gaon Panchayat with a request to convene a special meeting to discuss a motion of no confidence against the petitioner to continue as the President of 79 no. Kadong Gaon Panchayat. The petitioner has also assailed a letter dated 13.05.2022 of the Secretary of 79 no. Kadong Gaon Panchayat, whereby, the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat had referred the requisition notice dated 28.04.2022 to the President of Mandia Anchalik Panchayat to take necessary steps for convening a special meeting to discuss the motion of no confidence expressed by the 9 [nine] nos. of Ward Members of the Gaon Panchayat vide the requisition notice dated 28.04.2022.
2. In the Panchayat General Election, the petitioner came to be directly elected for the post of President of 79 no. Kadong Gaon Panchayat ['the Gaon Panchayat', for short], District - Barpeta under the jurisdiction of Mandia Anchalik Panchayat and Barpeta Zilla Parishad in terms of Section 6[1][b] of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 ['the Panchayat Act', for short].
3. I have heard Mr. R. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. N.K. Dev Nath, learned Standing Counsel, Panchayat & Rural Development [P&RD] Department for the respondent nos. 1, 3, 4, 5 & 6; Mr. R. Talukdar, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent no. 2; and Mr. N.H. Mazarbhuiya, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 7 - 15.
4. It has been contended on behalf of the petitioner that the requisition notice dated 28.04.2022 was referred by the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat without placing the requisition notice dated 28.04.2022 before the petitioner to seek his approval to convene the special meeting and without waiting for expiry of the mandatory period of 15 [fifteen] days thereafter, for the petitioner as the President of the Gaon Panchayat to accord approval on the requisition notice submitted by the 9 [nine] nos. of Ward Members. Such reference of the matter by the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat to the Anchalik Panchyat on 13.05.2022 was beyond the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat. A contention is also advanced to the effect that a writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 922/2021 questioning the validity of a process initiated by an earlier requisition notice dated 07.12.2020 on the matter of a no confidence motion has been pending for adjudication as on 28.04.2022, when the subsequent requisition notice was submitted and therefore such an exercise is not permissible when the earlier process is sub-judice.
5. At this juncture, it is apposite to refer to the provisions of Section 15 of the Panchayat Act. Section 15 of the Panchayat Act has provided for the matter of no confidence against the President and the Vice-President of the Gaon Panchayat. It is provided, inter alia, in sub- section [1] of Section 15 that every President of a Gaon Panchayat shall deemed to have vacated his office forthwith when a resolution expressing want of confidence in him is passed by two third majority of the total number of members of the Gaon Panchayat. It has also provided for the procedure for convening a special meeting. As per Section 15[1], a special meeting is to be convened by the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat with the approval of the President of the Gaon Panchayat. In case such a special meeting is not convened within a period of 15 [fifteen] days from the date of receipt of the notice, the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat is required to refer the matter within 3 [three] days therefrom to the President of the concerned Anchalik Panchayat, who has, in turn, to convene the special meeting within 7 [seven] days from the date of receipt of the information from the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat and preside over such meeting. In case the President of th
Point of Law : Process subsequent to requisition notices expressing want of confidence had failed finally either on technical grounds or due to procedural irregularities, this Court, thus, is of the ....
Point of Law : Section 17 [3] of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 has clearly stipulated that in case of any special meeting [which is a meeting for no confidence motion], 3 [three] days' clear notice h....
The Notice for the special meeting was found to be in violation of the statutory prescription of 3 clear days' notice as per Section 17[3] of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994.
Requisition notice received by Gaon Panchayat Secretary cannot be construed to be due notice to President and the period of 15 [fifteen] days as contemplated under Section 15 can be counted only from....
Word ‘lost’ appearing in 2nd proviso to section 15(1), in deference to fundamental principles of statutory interpretation, has to be essentially comprehended in text and context in which it appears.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.