IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
Prabhati Dhodrai D/o Nuwel Dhodrai – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Assam – Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 6610 of 2021
Decided On : 26-05-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 - Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 – Section 6[1][b], 15, 15[1], 18 – Writ petition has been instituted by the petitioner assailing proceedings initiated by a requisition notice submitted Panchayat in its entirety as the proceeding had ultimately culminated in a special meeting held in office - The process subsequent to requisition notices expressing want of confidence had failed finally either on technical grounds or due to procedural irregularities, this Court, thus, is of the considered view that it would be failing in its duty in exercising its power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India if this Court does not direct the petitioner to hold a special meeting to decide the no confidence motion brought against her. (Para 19)
Finding of the court:
Court is of considered view that it cannot be oblivious of the fact that on all these three occasions requisition notices were submitted by more than two-third majority of total number of members of Gaon Panchayat expressing want of confidence against President of Gaon Panchayat i.e. petitioner – As on all three occasions, process subsequent to requisition notices expressing want of confidence had failed finally either on technical grounds or due to procedural irregularities, this Court, thus, is of the considered view that it would be failing in its duty in exercising its power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India if this Court does not direct petitioner to hold a special meeting to decide the no confidence motion brought against her.
Results: Writ petition is allowed.
JUDGMENT :
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
1. The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been instituted by the petitioner assailing the proceedings initiated by a requisition notice submitted by 7 [seven] nos. of Ward Members of Doolahat Sonapur Gaon Panchayat on 07.10.2021 in its entirety as the proceeding had ultimately culminated in a special meeting held on 05.11.2021 in the office of the Lakhimpur Zila Parishad at North Lakhimpur. In the special meeting held on 05.11.2021, the alleged motion of no confidence initiated against the petitioner as the President of Doolahat Sonapur Gaon Panchayat was stated to have been passed with twothird majority since 7 [seven] nos. of Ward Members of Doolahat Sonapur Gaon Panchayat voted against the petitioner.
2. The necessary facts which have led the petitioner to institute the present writ petition can be briefly narrated as follows:
2.2. On an earlier occasion, 7 [seven] nos. of Ward Members of the Gaon Panchayat submitted a requisition notice in writing expressing want of confidence in the petitioner as the President and the said process led to holding of a special meeting on 14.12.2020. As per the resolution passed in the special meeting held on 14.12.2020, the motion of no confidence was held to have been passed against the petitioner. Aggrieved by the said resolution alleged to have been passed in the special meeting held on 14.12.2020, the petitioner had instituted a writ petition, W.P. [C] no. 255/2021. The writ petition, W.P. [C] no. 255/2021 was allowed by an order dated 03.03.2021 finding that there was a specific violation of Section 15[1], the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994, as amended.
2.3. There was another move on the part of 7 [seven] nos. of Ward Members of the Gaon Panchayat to remove the petitioner from the post of President as they had submitted another requisition notice on 30.04.2021 to convene a special meeting to discuss a motion of no confidence against the petitioner. The parties are not in dispute of the fact that the said requisition notice did not culminate in a special meeting for discussion on the motion. Thus, it cannot be said that any motion of no confidence was lost on the basis of the said requisition notice dated 30.04.2021.
2.4. It was on 07.10.2021, 7 [seven] nos. of Ward Members of the Gaon Panchayat had once again submitted a requisition notice by addressing the same to the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat to convene a special meeting to discuss a motion of no confidence against the President of the Gaon Panchayat i.e. the petitioner by bringing in a number of allegations regarding illegalities / irregularities allegedly committed by the petitioner in the capacity of the President of the Gaon Panchayat.
2.5. It transpires from a letter of the President of Naoboicha Anchalik Panchayat dated 28.10.2021 that the President of Naoboicha Anchalik Panchayat received a letter from the Secretary, Doolahat Sonapur Gaon Panchayat on 22.10.2021 wherein the Secretary, Doolahat Sonapur Gaon Panchayat mentioned that when the requisition notice submitted by the 7 [seven] nos. of Ward Members of Doolahat Sonapur Gaon Panchayat expressing want of confidence in the petitioner as the President, the President did not act properly to accord her approval for convening the special meeting. In the letter dated 28.10.2021, the President of Naoboicha Anchalik Panchayat had opined that the motions of no confidence, brought against the petitioner by the earlier requisition notices, dated 30.04
Ali Ahmed Mazumdar vs. State of Assam and others
Forhana Begum Laskar vs. State of Assam and others
Kamrul Islam Laskar vs. State of Assam
Point of Law : Process subsequent to requisition notices expressing want of confidence had failed finally either on technical grounds or due to procedural irregularities, this Court, thus, is of the ....
Point of Law : Section 17 [3] of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 has clearly stipulated that in case of any special meeting [which is a meeting for no confidence motion], 3 [three] days' clear notice h....
Adherence to procedural formalities and timelines outlined in the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994, is crucial in matters related to motions of no confidence against elected office-bearers in Gaon Panchayat....
Requisition notice received by Gaon Panchayat Secretary cannot be construed to be due notice to President and the period of 15 [fifteen] days as contemplated under Section 15 can be counted only from....
The Notice for the special meeting was found to be in violation of the statutory prescription of 3 clear days' notice as per Section 17[3] of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.