IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Rashida Khatun – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Assam And Ors. – Respondent
WP(C) 3223 of 2023
Decided on : 28-11-2023
Writ Petition - Removal of President from Gaon Panchayat - Assam Panchayat Act, 1994, Section 15 & 18(5) - The court set aside the resolution of no confidence and restored the petitioner to the post of President, with liberty to convene a special meeting for discussing the no confidence motion within a specified time period.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the resolution removing them from the post of President, Rampur Satra Gaon Panchayat and the communication issued by the Executive Officer Batadrava Anchalik Panchayat. The petitioner alleged that the requisition for no confidence was submitted by 8 Ward Members, and the matter was referred to the Batadrava Anchalik Panchayat without waiting for the mandatory 15-day period.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the actions of the authorities contravened Section 15 of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994, and set aside the resolution of no confidence. The court also restored the petitioner to the post of President and granted liberty to convene a special meeting for discussing the no confidence motion within a specified time period.
Issues: The main issue was whether the actions of the authorities in convening the no confidence meeting and removing the petitioner from the post of President were in compliance with the provisions of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the failure to comply with the mandatory 15-day period for convening the no confidence meeting amounted to an infraction of Section 15 of the Act, and accordingly set aside the resolution of no confidence.
Final Decision: The court set aside the resolution of no confidence, restored the petitioner to the post of President, and granted liberty to convene a special meeting for discussing the no confidence motion within a specified time period. The court also restricted the petitioner from taking any financial decisions during this period, except for day-to-day activities in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer of the Nagaon Zilla Parishad.
JUDGMENT :
The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the resolution dated 29.05.2023 thereby removing the petitioner from the post of President, Rampur Satra Gaon Panchayat as well as the impugned communication dated 29.05.2023 issued by the Executive Officer Batadrava Anchalik Panchayat.
2. The specific case of the petitioner herein is that the requisition was submitted by the 8 (eight) Ward Members of Rampur Satra Gaon Panchayat expressing no confidence against the petitioner who was the President of the said Gaon Panchayat. The said requisition was received by the Secretary, Rampur Satra Gaon Panchayat on 17.03.2023. Thereupon, on 18.03.2023, the said notice regarding no confidence against the petitioner was served upon the petitioner. The further case of the petitioner is that without waiting for the mandatory period of 15 (fifteen) days, the Secretary, Rampur Satra Gaon Panchayat referred the matter vide communication dated 30.03.2023 to the President, Batadrava Anchalik Panchayat. Thereupon, it is the further case of the petitioner that 10 (ten) Ward members joined together to file a writ petition before this Court which was registered and numbered as WP(C) No.2363/2023 whereby this Court vide an order dated 17.05.2023 issued notice and further observed that pendency of the writ petition shall not be a bar for the respondent authorities to proceed with the matter as regards convening of the special meeting to discuss the motion of no confidence as per the provisions of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 (for short, ‘the Act of 1994’). The petitioner further stated that on 29.05.2023, the special meeting was convened at 11:00 AM showing that the said meeting was being convened as per the direction of this Court. 9 (nine) Members voted against the petitioner and on the basis of which the President of the Batadrava Anchalik Panchayat declared that the meeting of no confidence was over. On the same date, the Executive Officer of Batadrava Anchalik Panchayat issued a communication to the Deputy Commissioner, Nagaon submitting the minutes of the no confidence meeting. It is however not known what steps have been taken thereupon by the Deputy Commissioner, Nagaon. The petitioner on coming to learn about the same has approached this Court by filing the instant writ petition.
3. This Court vide an order dated 05.06.2023 issued notice and in the meantime it was directed that the Gaon Panchayat authorities shall not take any major decision as regards the financial affairs of the Gaon Panchayat other than the decisions as regards its day to day affairs.
4. The record reveals that the private respondents, i.e. the respondent Nos.8 to 16 have filed their affidavit-in-opposition wherein it was duly admitted that on 18.03.2023, the President’s approval was sought for in order to convene the meeting of no confidence. It was also mentioned that the then President of Rampur Satra Gaon Panchayat, i.e. the petitioner did not accord the approval of the same and as such the Secretary, Rampur Satra Gaon Panchayat forwarded the letter on 30.03.2023 to the President of Batadrava Anchalik Panchayat for convening the meeting of no confidence. It was further mentioned that on the basis of the orders dated 08.05.2023 and 17.05.2023 passed in WP(C) No.2363/2023, the no confidence meeting was held on 29.05.2023 which was presided over by the President of Batadrava Anchalik Panchayat, and thereupon, a no confidence was passed against the petitioner by following the provisions of Section 15 & 18 (5) of the Act of 1994. Further to that, in the said affidavit, various judgments have been referred to.
5. Be that as it may, it is seen that on 09.11.2023, the Chief Executive Officer, Nagaon Zilla Parishad had in pursuance to an order dated 18.10.2023 passed by this Court in I.A.(C) No.2790/2023 conferred powers upon one Musabbir Hussain, the Vice-President of Rampur Satra Gaon Panchayat to function as the President of Rampur Satra Gaon Panc
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory nature of the 15-day period for convening a no confidence meeting as per Section 15 of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994.
In a judicial proceeding any interference of an order which a person may be beneficiary of cannot be initiated and concluded without issuing notice to person who is beneficiary.
Section 15(1) of Panchayat Act categorically mandates that there should be service of notice of no confidence motion upon President by Secretary thereby giving him 15 clear days.
Section 15(2) of Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 which provides for giving notice to President for purpose of holding a No Confidence Motion is mandatory and non compliance of such mandatory provision and ....
The court emphasized that the President duly elected continues to discharge the functions as per the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994, and directed the authorities to comply with the law.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the actions taken to initiate a No-Confidence-Motion must comply with the provisions of Section 15(1) of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.