IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Devashis Baruah, J.
Gita Talukdar and Others - Appellants
Versus
Regional Manager and Another - Respondents
MAC App. No. 103 of 2012
Decided On : 11-08-2022
Motor Vehicles Act - Compensation Calculation - 168 - The court discussed the calculation of just and fair compensation under section 168 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. It referred to the Supreme Court's conclusions in the case of Pranoy Sethi and highlighted the principles for determining future prospects, loss of consortium, loss of estate, and funeral expenses. The court modified the compensation awarded by the tribunal and directed the insurance company to deposit the modified award with interest.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved an appeal under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against a judgment and award passed by the Member MACT, Kamrup (M), at Guwahati in a MAC case. The appeal sought enhancement of the compensation awarded due to a fatal accident caused by rash and negligent driving.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the compensation awarded by the tribunal was insufficient and modified the award based on the principles established in the case of Pranoy Sethi. It directed the insurance company to deposit the modified award with interest.
Issues: The issues included the cause of the accident, entitlement to compensation, and the determination of just and fair compensation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principles outlined in the case of Pranoy Sethi to calculate the modified compensation, considering future prospects, loss of consortium, loss of estate, and funeral expenses.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the appeal, directing the insurance company to deposit the modified compensation with interest and returning the LCR to the tribunal.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. Sidhant Dutta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and Ms. S. Roy, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1.
2. This is an appeal under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and award dated 15.7.2006 passed by the learned Member MACT, Kamrup (M), at Guwahati in MAC case No. 1638/2003. The reason for filing the instant appeal is for enhancement of the compensation as was awarded vide the impugned judgment and award.
3. The facts of the instant case is that on 10.7.2003 at about 1.00 p.m. while Ramesh Ch. Talukar (since deceased) and three others including one girl were travelling by a Maruti Car bearing registration No. AS 25 C 7124, the said Maruti Car was involved in an accident at Uumsaw Naongkharai due to rash and negligent driving by the driver of the said Maruti Car and resultantly Ramesh Ch. Talukdar and two others, namely, Umesh Talukdar and Bhubeneswar Matakar died. A Nongpoh PS GDE No. 177 and GR Case No. 1 12/03 under sections 279/337/304A, IPC was registered against the driver of the Maruti Car.
4. Subsequent thereto, a claim application was filed by the appellants who were the claimants therein before the Member MACT at Guwahati on 12.9.2003 claiming an amount of Rs. 36,76,000. The claimants application was registered and numbered as MAC Case No. 1 638/2006.
5. The opposite party No. 1 who was driver-cum-owner of the vehicle in question filed his written statement wherein he stated that the vehicle met with an accident on 30.7.2003 due to a mechanical defect of the vehicle. It was further mentioned that the driver of the vehicle had a valid driving license on the date of the accident bearing D/'L No. 2023/NV/99 valid up to 18.5.2010. Further to that it has also been mentioned that the vehicle in question was insured with the National Insurance Company Limited., Hojai Branch Nagaon, Assam and the said vehicle has a comprehensive policy No. 200203/31/03/6100490 which was valid up to the midnight of 7.7.2004. The opposite party No. 2 who was the National Insurance Company Ltd had filed their written statement thereby denying the claim of the claimants.
6. On the basis of the said pleadings as many as 3 issues were framed which were:
(i) Whether the accident took place due to rash and negligent driving by the driver of the Maruti Car No. AS 25 C 7124 whereby Shri Ramesh Ch. Talukdar was killed?
(ii) Whether the claimants are entitled to any compensation, if so, “what would be the just compensation and from whom recoverable?
(iii) To what other relief or reliefs the claimants are entitled to?
7. On behalf of the claimants as many as 3 witnesses were examined and various documents were exhibited. The opposite parties in the said claim proceedings did not file their evidence.
8. The learned tribunal vide the judgment and award dated 15.7.2006 came to a finding as regards the issue No. 1 that the death caused to Ramesh Ch. Talukdar was due to rash and negligent driving of the vehicle No. AS 25 C 7124 Maruti Car and the vehicle was having all valid documents at the time of accident. As regards the issue No. 2 which related to as to whether the claimants were entitled to compensation and. if so, what would be the just compensation and from whom recoverable, the tribunal came to a finding that the amount of Rs. 11,66,000 was the just and reasonable compensation in the case and further directed that out of the said amount an amount of Rs. 2,00,000 each be kept in a Fixed Deposit in the name of the claimant Nos. 2 and 3 and a sum of Rs. 1,00,000 be kept in the Fixed Deposit in the name of the claimant No. 1 for a period of 37 months and the balance amount with interest would be paid to the claimant No. 1. It was also held that the awarded amount of Rs. 11,66,000 which was inclusive of the no fault award to carry an interest of 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition, i.e., 12.9.2003 till payment. The opposite party No. 2, i.e., the National Insurance C
New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Somwati
Magma General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Narayana
AI
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of section 168 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 to calculate just and fair compensation for fatal accidents, based on the principles....
The family pension received by the wife of the deceased in a road traffic accident is not a "pecuniary advantage" and is not liable for deduction while determining the compensation under the provisio....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Rule 220-A(3) of the Rules of 1998 for determining future prospects and the use of the multiplier as per the Second Schedule to ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the principles set by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in determining compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, particularly in cases ....
Point of law: Motor Vehicles –Motor Vehicles Act is a beneficial legislation aimed at providing relief to the victims or their families, in cases of genuine claims. In case where a parent has lost th....
The Court applied the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in determining compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, emphasizing the retrospective applicability of Supreme Court decisions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.