SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 226

ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Achyut Kr Gohain S/o Late Suneswar Gohain – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: M. Khan, A. Buragohain.
For the Respondent: C. Baruah.

JUDGMENT :

ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY, J.

1. Heard Mr. A. Buragohain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. C. Baruah, learned Standing Counsel for the NHIDCL representing the respondent No. 3.

2. Assailing an order dated 08.07.2023 issued by the General Manager (P), NHIDCL, PMU-Dibrugarh (respondent No. 3) rejecting the claim made by the petitioner for payment of compensation for acquiring the land, the present writ petition is filed.

3. The brief facts of the case is that by a Notification dated 15.09.2014, the land of the petitioner measuring an area of 1 Bigha 3 Katha 18 Lessa covered by Dag No. 103 at village 108, Khowang FS Grant, under Mouza-Moran in the district of Dibrugarh was acquired for construction of four laning National Highways-37 in the stretch of Demow to Dibrugarh. Accordingly, compensation with regard to zirat has already been paid to the petitioner.

4. The award under Section 19G of the National Highways Act, 1956 was also passed by the competent authorities. In terms of the aforesaid award, the petitioner was granted compensation against the value of land under acquisition, 100% solatium on the amount in accordance with the Right to Fair Compensation and Tran

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top