M. R. PATHAK, SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Arabinda Biswas – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
The extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court has been sought to be invoked by filing this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by putting to challenge the opinion rendered vide impugned order dated 25.05.2001 passed by the learned Foreigners Tribunal no. 3rd, Morigaon in F.T. Case No. 279/2015. By the impugned judgment, the petitioners, who were the proceedees before the learned Tribunal, have been declared to be a foreigner post 25.03.1971.
2. The facts of the case may be put in a nutshell as follows:
(ii) As per requirement under Section 9 of the Foreigners Act, 1946 to prove that the proceedees were not foreigners, the petitioners had filed their written statement on 18.09.2013 along with certain documents in said F.T. Case No. 279/2015 before the Foreigners Tribunal 3rd Morigaon.
(iii) The learned Tribunal, after considering the facts and circumstances and taking into account of the provisions of Section 9 of the Foreigners Act, 1946 had come to a finding that the petitioners as opposite pa
Fateh Mohd. Vs. Delhi Administration
Sudhir Roy vs. Union of India reported in 2019 (1) GauLT 353
Motior Rahman vs. Union of India
Dalgobinda Paricha v. Nimai Charan Misra
Ghaus Mohammad Vs. Union of India
Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences and Anr. Vs. Bikartan Das & Ors.
Borhan Ali vs. Union of India reported in 2018 (4) GauLT 392
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.