Back
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Mrinal Kanti Seal S/o Lt. Monindra Kumar Seal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent
The grievance raised in this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is with regard to the promotion which the petitioners claim from Grade IV to Grade III under the Assam Ministerial District Establishment Service Rules, 1967 (hereinafter the Rules, 1967).
2. The background facts leading to the aforesaid claim are narrated hereinbelow in brief.
3. While the petitioner no. 1 was appointed as Process Server on 12.10.1993, the petitioner no. 2 was appointed as a Peon on 31.08.1988 in the establishment of the Office of the deputy Commissioner, Hailakandi. It is not in dispute that both the aforesaid posts are in the Grade IV. The post in Grade III has a promotional quota of 10% which are to be filled up from eligible candidates in the feeder cadre of Grade IV and the educational qualification at that time was prescribed to be Higher Secondary. It is the case of the petitioners that both of them were eligible for such consideration and in spite of meeting the eligibility criteria, both by means of educational qualification and other factors, the petitioners were not given the benefit of promotion. The Rules however had undergone an amendment in the year 2015 wherei
The main legal point established in the judgment is that any direction for consideration of promotion must be in line with the present Rules, and the court cannot grant relief based on earlier qualif....
Promotion eligibility governed by current administrative rules; previous qualifications irrelevant after absorption into new regulations.
The court established that the right to promotion is determined by the rules in force at the time of consideration, and the Service Rules of 2020 do not permit promotion from Grade-IV to Junior Assis....
The court upheld the validity of amended promotion rules, ruling they apply prospectively and that participation in the selection process waives the right to challenge it.
Under Rule 12 (1), there is a requirement for making an assessment of likely number of vacancies to be filled up by promotion in next year in each cadre and such assessment is required to be made bef....
The right to be considered for promotion is determined by the rules in force at the time of consideration, not by prior rules, as established by Supreme Court precedent.
when a new post is created, the concept of Rules obtaining when the vacancies arose is inappiicable as what is created is a new post on account of re-structuring of the cadre.
The amendment mandating a Bachelor's Degree for certain promotions was constitutionally valid, emphasizing the employer's prerogative to set qualification standards related to job responsibilities.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
