Back
MANISH CHOUDHURY
Sri Mongve Rongpi, S/o Sri Jayanta Rongpi – Appellant
Versus
Indian Oil Corporation Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of petition for dealership (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. contentions regarding the implications of being a member of the karbi anglong autonomous council on eligibility. (Para 5) |
| 3. arguments on eligibility and employment status (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's analysis of eligibility criteria (Para 9 , 10 , 26 , 34) |
| 5. petitioner sought to challenge the iocl's refusal to process his dealership application. (Para 20) |
| 6. principles on state largesse and contract (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 7. court affirms the interpretation of eligibility as per iocl's guidelines. (Para 36 , 39) |
| 8. writ petition dismissed (Para 41) |
The petitioner has instituted the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking setting aside and quashing of a Letter bearing no. TDO/R/RO Dealership/Diphu Town/731 dated 17.02.2023 issued by the respondent no. 2 on behalf of the respondent Indian Oil Corporation Limited [IOCL] and for a direction in the nature of mandamus to the respondent authorities in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited [IOCL] to award the Retail Outlet Dealership at the location, Diphu Town Not on NH/SH, District – Karbi Anglong to the petitioner.
2. The respondent
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
