SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Cal) 99

PARTHA SARATHI SEN
Md. Sazzad Hossain – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ambarnath Banerjee, Adv., Mr. Supratik Shyanal, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Puspendu Chakraborty, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Partha Sarathi Sen, J.

1. In this writ petition the writ petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ of mandamus upon the respondents more specifically upon the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 commanding them to appoint the writ petitioner as a distributor under the Rajiv Gandhi Gramin LPG scheme (herein after referred to as the ‘said scheme’ in short) for Kojalsha G.P., Berugram, Block-Ketugram-1, District-Burdwan.

2. The writ petitioner was an aspirant to be appointed as a distributor however, his candidature was turned down by the respondent No.2 & 3 that is the oil company and its functionaries.

3. In course of his Argument, Mr. Banerjee, Learned Advocate for the writ petitioner submits before this Court that pursuant to an advertisement published in a daily newspaper, the petitioner on 06.06.2013 applied for a distributorship under the said scheme in respect of the abovementioned G.P. and at that time the writ petitioner offered 0.15 decimal of land in plot no. 724 for his proposed godown space.

4. It is further argued by Mr. Banerjee that the at the time of field verification it was noticed by the officer of the respondent oil company that in the title deed of the petitioner i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top