Back
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Rimjhim Das (Bora), W/o. Lt. Ranjan Kumar Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
The issue raised in this petition is towards a claim for appointment on compassionate ground.
2. The facts projected in this petition is that the husband of the petitioner, late Ranjan Kr. Das, was working as a Grade-IV employee in the Public Works Department (PWD) at Tezpur who had died in harness on 31.12.2006.
3. The petitioner who claims to be eligible and qualified had accordingly applied for appointment on compassionate ground on 04.04.2007. As the said application was not duly considered, the petitioner had earlier approached this Court by filing WP(C)/7473/2013. In the said case, the apprehension of the petitioner was that the lack of consideration might have been on the ground that the husband was working on work charge basis and not on a regular employee. The said writ petition was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 28.03.2014 wherein it has been held that for the purposes of consideration for appointment on compassionate ground, no distinction should be carved out between a regular employee and a work charge employee as such employee also gets the GPF and another benefits. In spite of the said judgment, no action was taken and accordingly, the present writ petitio
Compassionate appointment is not a matter of right and should be provided immediately to redeem the family in distress, and it cannot be claimed or offered after a lapse of time and after the crisis ....
Compassionate appointment is not a vested right and should be provided immediately to redeem the family in distress. Delay in seeking compassionate appointment and changed financial circumstances may....
Compassionate appointments must be claimed promptly; significant delays undermine eligibility.
Compassionate appointments must be sought immediately after the death of a government employee, as delays negate the intended relief purpose.
Compassionate appointments must be pursued promptly; delays diminish the claim's validity and urgency.
Appointment on compassionate ground is not a matter of any vested right and is not a source of recruitment. Prolonged delay dilutes the sense of immediacy in granting compassionate appointment.
Compassionate appointments are not vested rights and must be considered promptly to address immediate financial crises; delays diminish the urgency of such claims.
Compassionate appointments are exceptional measures intended for immediate relief and cannot be claimed after significant delays, as they are not vested rights and depend on the financial circumstanc....
Compassionate appointment is not a right and can only be granted under exceptional circumstances, as per the legal provisions and principles discussed by the court.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
