SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
GUNAWATI PHUKAN HAZARIKA W/O LATE MINTU HAZARIKA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI, J.
1. Heard Shri DP Chaliha, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. M Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri D Bora, learned State Counsel, Assam as well as Shri R Dhar, learned Standing Counsel, Public Works Department, Assam.
2. The claim pertains to an appointment on compassionate ground.
3. The facts projected are that the husband of the petitioner, Mintu Hazarika, who was an employee in the office of the Executive Engineer, Public works Department, Kaliabor Rural Road Division, had died-in-harness on 28.05.2016. The petitioner had made an application for appointment in a Grade-III, LDA post on compassionate ground which was forwarded by the Executive Engineer, PWD, Kaliabor Rural Road Division to the Addl. Deputy Commissioner, Personnel, Nagaon vide letter dated 22.09.2016.
4. It is the case of the petitioner that in the District Level Committee (DLC) meeting held on 14.12.2016, the name of the petitioner was recommended for a Grade-III post. However, the State Level Committee (SLC) in its meeting held on 31.12.2018 rejected the case of the petitioner on of availability of vacancy under the 5% quota.
5. Shri Chaliha, learned Senior Co
Compassionate appointments must be pursued promptly; delays diminish the claim's validity and urgency.
Compassionate appointments must be sought immediately after the death of a government employee, as delays negate the intended relief purpose.
Compassionate appointments are not vested rights and must be considered promptly to address immediate financial crises; delays diminish the urgency of such claims.
Compassionate appointments are not vested rights and must be considered promptly to address immediate financial crises; significant delays undermine this purpose.
Appointment on compassionate ground is not a matter of any vested right and is not a source of recruitment. Prolonged delay dilutes the sense of immediacy in granting compassionate appointment.
Compassionate appointments are not vested rights and must be considered promptly; significant delays dilute the urgency of financial need.
Compassionate appointment is intended to provide immediate succor to a bereaved family, and any delay dilutes the sense of immediacy and may lead to the loss of the opportunity for compassionate appo....
Compassionate appointment is not a vested right and should be provided immediately to redeem the family in distress. Delay in seeking compassionate appointment and changed financial circumstances may....
Compassionate appointments are intended for immediate relief and cannot be claimed after significant delays, as the sense of urgency is lost.
Compassionate appointments must be claimed promptly; significant delays undermine eligibility.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.