IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OFASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI, J.
Dipen Baglari S/O Late Baneswar Baglari – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Assam And Ors – Respondents
WP(C)/6386/2023
Decided on : 18-12-2024
(A) Compassionate Appointment - Objective of compassionate appointment is to provide immediate relief to bereaved families. Delay in application undermines the purpose of the scheme. The Supreme Court in Debabrata Tiwari laid down principles regarding the necessity of immediacy in claims for compassionate appointments. (Paras 7, 9, 10)
(B) Delay and Laches - The court emphasized that compassionate appointments cannot be claimed after a significant delay, as the financial circumstances of the family may have changed. (Paras 9, 10)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner applied for compassionate appointment after the death of his father, a PWD employee, in 2014. His application was rejected by the SLC on grounds of delay and under qualification.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the delay of over a decade in applying for compassionate appointment undermines the claim.
Issues: The main issues were the validity of the rejection based on delay and the qualifications of the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that compassionate appointments are not a vested right and must be claimed promptly to address immediate financial crises.
Result: Writ petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Heard Ms. T. Ramchiary, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri JK Goswami, learned State Counsel as well as Shri R. Dhar, learned Standing Counsel, PWD.
2. The matter pertains to a claim for appointment on compassionate ground.
It is the projected case of the petitioner that his father Baneswar Baglari, was serving as a regular permanent labour in the Public Works Department (PWD), who had died in harness on 06.10.2014. The petitioner who claims to be eligible had duly applied for appointment on compassionate ground. However, as no action was taken, the petitioner had filed WP(C)/1303/2017 in which this Court vide order dated 09.02.2018 had disposed of the said writ petition with a direction to place the case of the petitioner before the District Level Committee (DLC). As nothing substantial was done, the petitioner had again filed a writ petition being WP(C)/2598/2022 before this Court. The same was disposed of with a direction to place his case before the next available DLC, Morigaon District for consideration as per law.
3. After the aforesaid direction, the case of the petitioner was taken up for consideration by the DLC, Morigaon in its meeting dated 22.01.2022 and his case was recommended for consideration by the State Level Committee (SLC). The SLC in its meeting held on 16.08.2022 after consideration of the case of the petitioner had rejected his application mainly on the grounds that he was under qualified and had applied after 4 years from the date of death of the deceased father.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that after the aforesaid rejection by the SLC is not sustainable in law as the petitioner had indeed applied for compassionate appointment within the prescribed period and not after 4 years from the death. In this connection, she has drawn the attention of this Court to the writ petition filed in the year 2017 which was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 09.02.2018. She has also submitted that the petitioner had applied for the post of Grade – IV and therefore, was not under qualified.
5. Per contra, both Shri Goswami, the learned State Counsel and Shri Dhar, the learned Standing Counsel, PWD have raised the issue of delay and laches in consideration for appointment on compassionate ground. It is submitted that the death was in the year 2014 and the objective of giving appointment on compassionate ground is only to enable the bereaved family to overcome the sudden crisis faced. They have also cited the case of State of West Bengal vs. Debabrata Tiwari & Ors., reported in AIR 2023 SC 1467 and have submitted that after 10 years, no direction can be issued for appointment on compassionate ground.
6. The rival submissions have been duly considered.
7. The objective of offering an appointment on compassionate ground is only to give immediate succour to the bereaved family which has lost the sole breadwinner and in this case, admittedly more than a decade has passed.
8. In the instant case, it is not in dispute that the death of the deceased father was in the year 2014 and in the meantime, more than a decade have passed. Though, the grounds for rejection of the case of the petitioner cited by the SLC in its meeting dated 16.08.2022 are two-fold, namely, delay in applying and under qualified, the said grounds do not appear to be in consonance with the records. The aspect of being under qualified is also slightly ambiguous. However, the documents annexed to the writ petition does not make it clear in which category of post the application for compassionate appointment was made. In fact, the application has not been annexed to the writ petition and it is only certain communications subsequent to order passed by this Court which have been enclosed.
9. Having said that, this Court ultimately has to look into the objective of the Scheme for appointment on compassionate ground and the aspect of delay in this regard cannot be ignored or overlooked. As on today, more than 10 yea
Compassionate appointments must be claimed promptly; significant delays undermine eligibility.
Appointment on compassionate ground is not a matter of any vested right and is not a source of recruitment. Prolonged delay dilutes the sense of immediacy in granting compassionate appointment.
Compassionate appointment is not a vested right and should be provided immediately to redeem the family in distress. Delay in seeking compassionate appointment and changed financial circumstances may....
Compassionate appointment is intended to provide immediate succor to a bereaved family, and any delay dilutes the sense of immediacy and may lead to the loss of the opportunity for compassionate appo....
Compassionate appointments must be sought promptly; significant delays negate claims as the urgency diminishes.
Compassionate appointments must be made promptly to address financial crises; significant delays render applications stale and unconsiderable.
Compassionate appointment is not a matter of right and should be provided immediately to redeem the family in distress, and it cannot be claimed or offered after a lapse of time and after the crisis ....
Compassionate appointments must be made promptly to address financial crises; significant delays render claims stale and invalid.
Compassionate appointments must be applied for within one year of the employee's death; delays undermine the claim's validity and significance.
Compassionate appointments must be made promptly to address financial distress; significant delays render claims stale and ineligible for consideration.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.