ROBIN PHUKAN
State of Nagaland – Appellant
Versus
Moarenla – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ROBIN PHUKAN, J.
1. Heard Mr. Imti Imsong, learned Additional Advocate General, Govt. of Nagaland for the review petitioners. And also heard Mr. Supongwati Walling, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. This review application No. 08/2022, under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), read with Sections 114 of the CPC and Chapter X of the Gauhati High Court Rules, is preferred by four applicants, namely, the State of Nagaland, represented by Chief Secretary, Govt. of Nagaland, The Finance Commissioner, Govt. of Nagaland, Commissioner and Secretary, Department of Power, Nagaland, Chief Engineer, Department of Power, Nagaland for reviewing the judgment and order, dated 20.09.2019, passed by this court in W.P. (C) No. 202(K)/2017.
3. And review application No. 06/2022 is preferred by the same applicants for reviewing the same common judgment and order dated 20.09.2019, passed by this court in W.P. (C) 237(K)/2018.
4. And review application No. 07/2022 is also being preferred by the same applicants for reviewing the same common judgment and order dated 20.09.2019, passed by this court in W.P. (C) 201 (K)/2017.
5. As all these three review applications are being
Aribam Tuleshwar Sharma vs. Aribam Pishak Sharma
Hari Vishnu Kamath vs. Ahmad Ishaque
Kamlesh Verma vs. Mayawati and Others
Moran Mar Basselios Catholicos vs. Most Rev. Mar Poulose Athanasius
State of West Bengal and Others vs. Kamal Sengupta and Another
Shivdeo Singh vs. State of Punjab
Thungabhadra Industries Ltd. vs. Govt. of A.P. AIR 1964 SC 1372
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.