SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, ARUN KUMAR RAI
Bokaro Steel Plant, a Unit of Steel Authority of India Limited, through its DGM (Law), Shri A. K. Upadhyay, son of Sri S. N. Upadhyay – Appellant
Versus
Hira Devi, wife of Biranchi Prasad Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
1. Mr. Bibhash Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the Bokaro Steel Plant, has submitted that in pursuance to order dated 18.03.2024, the steps have been taken by making paper publication for securing appearance of the private respondents. The said paper clippings have been filed along with the affidavit.
2. Mr. Bibhash Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, therefore, has submitted that the notice may be deemed to be accepted.
3. It has further been submitted that the matter has already been decided by this Court in batch of cases, i.e., Civil Review No.11 of 2021, and in view thereof, the instant matter may also be disposed of.
4. It has further been submitted that there is delay in filing the review petitions, i.e., Civil Review No.12 of 2021, 13 of 2021 and 45 of 2021, but since similar issue has been decided by this Court, hence, the delay may be condoned and same order may be passed.
5. This Court, considering the aforesaid fact, is of the view that the instant review petitions need to be disposed of in terms of the order passed in Civil Review No.11 of 2021 and batch matters.
6. There is no opposition in condoning the delay
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.