IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, JJ.
Md. Faiyaz Ahmad son of Md. Ishhaque Ansari – Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand – Respondent
Civil Review No. 107 of 2024
Decided On : 29-04-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction under article 226 for review petition. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. facts surrounding the pay scale for compounder and pharmacist posts. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. amendment of pay scale rules and its implications. (Para 8 , 9 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. respondent’s contention regarding petitioners' acceptance of reduced pay scale. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. claim for pay scale increased based on redesignation as pharmacist. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. review petition challenging retrospective application of amended rules. (Para 30 , 31 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 7. legal principles regarding grounds for review applications. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 8. assessment of vested rights in relation to amended rules. (Para 49 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 9. dismissal of review petition based on acceptance of reduced pay scale. (Para 71 , 72) |
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
Prayer
1. The jurisdiction conferred to this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been invoked for review of the order dated 15.07.2024 passed in W.P(S) No.7247 of 2023, by which the prayer made on behalf of the petitioners to place them in the pay scale of Rs.5200-20200/- in Grade Pay of Rs. 2800/- from the pay scale of Rs. 5200-20200/- in Grade Pay Rs.1900/- has been held not sustainable in the eyes of law. Factual Matrix of the Case:
2. The brief facts of the case as pleaded in the instant review petition needs to refer herein which is being referred herein as under:
3. The petitioners averred that an advertisement being Advertisement no.01 of 2018 was published by the Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission inviting applications from eligible candidates for appointment on the post of various posts including Compounder and Pharmacist. As per the said advertisement, the pay scale of Compounder and Pharmacist was shown Rs.5200-20200/-, Grade Pay Rs.2800/- (Rs.29200-66600/-).
4. As per the said advertisement, essential qualification for the posts of Compounder and Pharmacist was Intermediate/10+2 (Science subject) with Diploma Course Pass or Matric Pass prior to 1994 with Diploma Course of Compounder/Pharmacist pass. It is also stated that the syllabus for appointment on the posts of Compounder and Pharmacist was also identical.
5. The specific case of these review petitioners is that they have been found eligible themselves applied for appointment on the post of Compounder and Pharmacist and on scrutiny admit cards were issued to the petitioners for appearing in the written examination, which was held on 2.12.2018.
6. The review petitioners appeared in the said examination and result was published on 8.2.2019 and the petitioners were declared successful candidates.
7. After publication of the result, the date was fixed for document verification which was scheduled on 14.2.2019. After document verification, final result was published on 16.4.2019 and the petitioners were declared successful.
8. The respondent-Department, Home, Jail and Disaster Management, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi vide notification as contained in Memo no.4743 dated 4.9.2019 amended Rule 16 (ii) of the Rules, 2016 and reduced the pay scale of Compounder to Rs.5200- 20200/-, Grade Pay Rs.1900/- from the pay scale of Rs.5200-20200/-, Grade Pay Rs.2800/-.
9. On being declared successful and after document verification, the petitioners were appointed on the post Compounder, and they joined on the said post vide office order as contained in Memo no.1229 dated 1.6.2023 issued under the signature of the Inspector General of Prison, Jharkhand, Ranchi, the services of the petitioners were confirmed with effect from 22.10.2021.
10. Being aggrieved with Rule 16(ii) of the Rules, 2016 by which the pay scale of Compounder was reduced to Rs.5200-20200/-, Grade Pay Rs.1900/- from the pay scale of Rs.5200-20200/-, Grade Pay Rs.2800/- a writ petition was preferred by the writ petitioners/review petitioners.
11.Before the writ Court the ground has been taken that the pay scale of Compounder and Pharmacist is sam
Moran Mar Basselios Catholicos and Anr. vs. Most Rev. Mar Poulose Athanasius and Ors.
Col. Avatar Singh Sekhon Vrs. Union of India
Sanjay Kumar Agarwal Vrs. State Tax Officer (1) & Anr.
MGB Gramin Bank v. Chakrawarti Singh
Review jurisdiction is strictly limited to apparent errors in the record or new evidence; acceptance of a reduced pay scale upon appointment restricts subsequent claims for higher pay.
The court held that the petitioners could not challenge the reduced pay scale as they accepted it upon joining, and no vested rights existed prior to their appointment.
The power of review is limited to correcting patent errors, not re-evaluating merits; mere recommendations do not confer enforceable rights.
Review jurisdiction is limited to correcting errors apparent on the record and does not allow for re-examination of the merits of a case.
The court ruled that a vested right to grade-pay cannot be unilaterally altered by the State post-appointment, affirming the principle of protecting established service conditions.
Tribunal cannot grant higher promotional pay scale to one cadre's employees matching another distinct cadre's juniors by one-time parity, as it exceeds jurisdiction absent Article 14 violation from r....
The determination of pay scales is the exclusive domain of the state, and courts should only intervene in cases of constitutional violations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.