SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 696

MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
Aldrin Malsawmtluanga – Appellant
Versus
State of Mizoram – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. A.R. Malhotra

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. A.R. Malhotra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mrs. Mary L. Khiangte, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 to 5 and Mr. B. Lalramenga, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 7. None appears for the respondent No. 6.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved with the final inter-se-seniority list dated 18.01.2019 of Scientific Officers under the Science & Technology Department, Government of Mizoram, wherein the petitioner had been placed at Serial No. 3 and the respondent Nos. 7 & 8 have been placed at Serial No. 1 & 2 respectively. The petitioner is also aggrieved with the relaxation of Column 12 of Annexure-1 of the 2016 Rules for consideration of promotion of the private respondents to the post of Senior Scientific Officers in the Directorate of Science & Technology and their consequential promotion order.

3. The petitioner’s counsel submits that the respondent Nos. 7 & 8 had been appointed to the post of Scientific Officers under the Mizoram Council of Science, Technology & Innovation, which was subsequently renamed as Mizoram Science, Technology & Innovation Council, herein after referred to as MISTIC (respondent No. 5

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top