SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 714

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J.
Nitya Nanda Pait, S/o. Late Nandirampait and Ors. – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Assam, Represented By The Commissioner And Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Government Of Assam and Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) No.6005 Of 2021
Decided On : 16-05-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. D. Das Sr. Adv.

IMPORTANT POINT
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to intervene in the selection process to rectify irregularities and ensure that only eligible candidates are considered for the position.

Headnote:

Selection Process - Assistant Professor - Advertisement, dated 25.05.2017 - - The judgment discusses the irregularities in the selection process for the post of Assistant Professor (Technical) in Government Engineering Colleges of the State. The court directed the Assam Public Service Commission (APSC) to verify the educational qualifications of the candidates and to subject only eligible candidates to the interview process. The court found that certain candidates did not possess the requisite educational qualifications and directed the APSC to publish a new list of qualified candidates and proceed with the viva voce/interview segment of the selection process. The court also reserved liberty for the petitioners to raise objections after the selection process is complete.

Fact of the Case:

The Assam Public Service Commission (APSC) issued an Advertisement inviting applications for the post of Assistant Professor (Technical) in Government Engineering Colleges of the State. The petitioners, who were found eligible, participated in the written examination and the language test. However, they were not shortlisted for the viva voce/interview segment of the selection process. The petitioners challenged the irregularities in the selection process and sought a direction for a de novo process.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that certain candidates did not possess the requisite educational qualifications and directed the APSC to publish a new list of qualified candidates and proceed with the viva voce/interview segment of the selection process. The court also reserved liberty for the petitioners to raise objections after the selection process is complete.

Issues: The main issue was the irregularities in the selection process for the post of Assistant Professor (Technical) and the petitioners' challenge to the same.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the selection process should not be continued in abeyance and directed the APSC to proceed with the publication of the list of qualified candidates and the viva voce/interview segment. The court also reserved liberty for the petitioners to raise objections after the selection process is complete.

Final Decision: The court directed the APSC to proceed with the publication of the list of qualified candidates and the viva voce/interview segment of the selection process within a period of two months. The court also reserved liberty for the petitioners to raise objections after the selection process is complete.

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. Diganta Das, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr. K Mohammad, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioners.

Also heard Mr. K. Gogoi, learned standing counsel, Higher Education Department; appearing on behalf of respondents No. 1 & 2; Mr. T. J. Mahanta, learned senior counsel, assisted by Ms. P. Sarma, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent No. 3[Assam Public Service Commission(APSC)]; Mr. S. Borthakur, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of respondents No. 4 to 18; Mr. S. Dutta, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. D. J. Medhi, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent No. 19; and Mr. D. S. Bhattacharya, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No. 20 to 28.

2. As consented to by the learned counsels appearing for the parties; this writ petition is taken-up for final consideration and disposal.

3. The facts as requisite for consideration of the issue as arising in the present proceeding, is noticed as under:

The Assam Public Service Commission(APSC) on a requisition being placed before it by the concerned Department, proceeded to issue an Advertisement, dated 25.05.2017, inviting applications, amongst others, for 66 post of Assistant Professor(Technical) in nine different subjects in various Government Engineering Colleges of the State.

The petitioners, herein, contend that they being so eligible, had submitted their respective applications in pursuance to the said Advertisement and they on being found to have satisfied the eligibility criterias as mandated therein; they were permitted to appear in the written examination held by the Assam Public Service Commission (APSC) in the matter w.e.f. 07.11.2019 to 13.11.2019. On conclusion of the said examination, the Assam Public Service Commission(APSC) vide the Notification, dated 28.05.2020, proceeded to publish the list of candidates, subject-wise, who had qualified for appearing in the next segment of the selection process i.e. the language test on local languages of the State.

The names of the petitioners duly figured in the said list as published vide the Notification, dated 28.05.2020. Thereafter, the petitioners, herein, along with other candidates whose names figured in the Notification, dated 28.05.2020, undertook the Language test on local languages of the State. On conclusion of the said language test, which has to be noted was of a qualifying nature, the Assam Public Service Commission (APSC) proceeded to publish a Notification, dated 06.10.2021, short-listing the candidates for appearing in the viva voce/interview segment of the selection process. The names of the petitioners, herein, did not figure in the said Notification, dated 06.10.2021, and accordingly, being aggrieved; the present proceeding has been instituted before this Court.

4. This Court while issuing notice in the matter vide an order, dated 12.11.2021, noticing the grievance raised by the petitioners in the matter that there were candidates included in the said Notification, dated 06.10.2021, who did not satisfy the eligibility criterias as mandated in the said Advertisement; directed the Assam Public Service Commission(APSC) to verify the respective educational qualifications of the candidates short-listed for the viva voce/interview segment of the selection process in respect of each Department for which they had so applied and to subject only such candidates who fulfill the eligibility criterias, to the interview process.

5. In terms of the directions as passed by this Court; it is seen that the Assam Public Service Commission(APSC) proceeded to constitute a Committee of Experts in the matter and the said Expert Committee proceeded to verify the credentials of each of the candidates who were held to be qualified to appear for the viva voce/interview segment of the selection process. The said Expert Committee after verifying the educational qualifications of all the candidates who were short-listed vide the Notification, dated 06.10.2021, pro

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top