SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Gau) 60

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
N.UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J.
Mridul Hazarika, S/o- Mr. Jogen Hazarika And Ors. – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Assam, Rep. BY The Comm. And Secy. To The Govt. Of Assam, Health And Family Welfare Deptt And Ors.  – Respondent
WP(C)/3286 Of 2023
Decided On : 06-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR. I H Laskar, Md. S Alom, Mr. M S Alam,Mr. P K Deka
For the Respondent: Ga, Assam, Sc, Health

The court affirmed that petitioners, having previously accepted the selection process, were barred from later contesting the methodology due to principles of waiver and acquiescence, despite alleging ineligibility of selected candidates.

Headnote:(A) Assam Laboratory Technician Service Rules, 2012 - Recruitment Process - Writ Petition challenging selection for vacancies for Laboratory Technicians after alleging ineligibility of candidates - Earlier bench annulled ineligible appointments and ordered recasting of the select list - Petitioners' claim for appointment rejected based on lower scores compared to selected candidates. (Para 2, 10, 12, 16)

(B) Fair Selection Process - The absence of a challenge to original selection process in earlier litigation results in waiver of rights to contest selection methodology in subsequent proceedings. (Para 10, 12, 13)

(C) Acquiescence and Waiver - Petitioners participated in initial selection without protest, hence barred from contesting selection process later. (Para 12, 13)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners challenged selection of five candidates for Laboratory Technician posts citing ineligibility, after a prior court ruling had mandated a recasting of the select list. Their applications met eligibility, but were omitted in selection.

Findings of Court:
No merit found in petitioners' challenge as their exam scores were significantly lower than those of new selectees.

Issues: The legality of the selection process and eligibility criteria were key points addressed.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that since petitioners did not challenge the selection process earlier and accepted the recasting order, they cannot later contest the methodology post-implementation.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to laboratory technician selection process (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding eligibility and selection process (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. judicial findings on earlier petition outcomes (Para 8 , 9)
4. analysis of the selection process and procedures (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. denial of petitioners' challenge to selection validity (Para 13 , 15)
6. writ petition dismissed (Para 16)

JUDGMENT :

N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J.

1. Heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Mr. P.K. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B. Gogoi, learned Addl. AG, Assam appearing for the State.

2. The writ petitioner in the present petition has presented a challenge to the selection of the respondent Nos. 5 to 9 for appointment as Laboratory Technician against the vacant post advertised vide advertisement dated 19-02-2011.

3. The petitioner in the present proceeding had, in pursuance to the advertisement dated 19-02-2011 issued by the Principal, Tezpur Medical College and Hospital inviting applications for recruitment against 48 (forty eight) numbers of vacant posts of Laboratory Technician in his establishment, had submitted their respective candidature for the said post. The applications submitted by the petitioners being found to be confirming to the required eligibility criteria, they were called for appearing in an interview held for the purpose. On conclusion of the selection process, a select list came to be published wherein the names of the petitioners did not find mention. Accordingly, 44 (forty four) candidates whose name figured in the select list, came to be appointed against the advertised vacant posts of Laboratory Technician. The petitioners, herein, having come to learn that amongst the appointed persons there were many candidates who did not fulfill the eligibility criteria as set out in the advertisement dated 19-02-2011, assailed the appointment and selection of the ineligible candidates by way of instituting a writ petition before this Court being W.P.(C) No. 6279/2018. The Coordinate Bench of this Court upon examining the contention raised by the parties to the proceeding, proceeded vide judgment and order dated 27-09-2022 to dispose of the said writ petition being W.P.(C) No. 6279/2018 interfering with the appointment of the private respondents therein, who were found to be ineligible for such selection and appointment as Laboratory Technician in pursuance to the advertisement dated 19-02-2011. The Coordinate Bench further directed the respondent authorities to fill up the vacancies now arising by recasting the select list in question, on the basis of marks obtained by the candidates in the selection process and to appoint those candidates who are found to be eligible on the basis of the qualification as per the advertisement dated 19-02-2011, including the petitioners, herein. The judgment and order dated 27-09-2022 was assailed by the candidates whose appointments now came to be interfered with before the Division Bench of this Court by way of instituting a writ appeal being W.A. No. 345/2022. The said writ appeal was disposed of vide order dated 01-11-2022 permitting the appellants, therein, to withdraw the said writ appeal to approach the learned Single Judge by way of filing a review application. The review application being Review Petition No. 168/2022 was instituted, however, the same was dismissed vide judgment and order dated 25-11-2022. The candidates whose selection was now interfered with, assailed the judgment and order dated 27-09-2022 as well as the review order dated 25-11-2022 by way of instituting a writ appeal being W.A. No. 23/2023. The said writ appeal upon consideration was dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 28-02-2023.

Upon conclusion of the said proceeding, the Principal-cum-Chief Superintendent, Tezpur Medical College and Hospital, Tezpur after recasting of the select list, proceeded to publish a select list of 05 (five) candidates, i.e.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top