SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 832

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN, JJ.
Monglu Choutal – Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam – Respondent
Criminal Appeal (J) Nos. 100, 101 of 2019
Decided On : 20-06-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : R. Sarma, N.K. Baruah.
For the Respondent: S.H. Bora.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court established that the presence of credible eyewitnesses and corroborating medical evidence can sustain a conviction for murder, even in the absence of the murder weapon, and that minor discrepancies in testimonies do not necessarily invalidate the prosecution's case.

Headnote:

MURDER - Conviction under IPC - Section 302, Section 34 IPC - The court discussed the provisions of Section 302 IPC, which defines the punishment for murder, and Section 34 IPC, which addresses acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention. The court interpreted these sections to establish that both accused acted in concert to commit the murder of Bina Chawra, leading to their conviction. The court emphasized that the presence of eyewitnesses and corroborating medical evidence supported the prosecution's case, despite the absence of the murder weapon.

Fact of the Case:

The case involves the murder of Bina Chawra, who was found dead with a severe neck injury. The informant, her son, alleged that the two accused, who had been staying at their home, killed her while she was sleeping. The investigation led to their arrest based on eyewitness accounts and medical evidence.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the testimonies of the eyewitnesses credible and consistent, corroborated by medical evidence from the post-mortem report. The court concluded that the prosecution had established the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.

Issues: The main issues included the reliability of eyewitness testimonies, the absence of the murder weapon, and whether the accused acted with a common intention to commit murder.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that minor inconsistencies in eyewitness accounts do not undermine the core of the prosecution's case, especially when corroborated by medical evidence. The principle of common intention under Section 34 IPC was applied to hold both accused liable for the murder.

Final Decision: The court affirmed the conviction and life sentence of both accused under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, finding no merit in the appeals against their conviction.

JUDGMENT :

MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.

1. Both these criminal appeals from Jail are directed against a Judgment and Order dated 30.05.2019 passed by the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Dibrugarh in Sessions Case no. 147 of 2016. By the Judgment and Order dated 30.05.2019, both the accused-appellants who faced the trial, have been convicted for the offence of murder under Section 302, Indian Penal Code [IPC] in aid of Section 34, IPC. Both the accused-appellants have been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-each, in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for another one month. It has been directed to pay compensation to the victim son of the deceased under the Assam Victim Compensation Scheme, 2012.

2. The instant case is regarding the death of one Bina Chawra. The investigation of the case was initiated on the basis of a First Information Report [FIR] [Ext.-2] lodged by the son of the deceased, Dipak Chawra [P.W.6] as the informant before the Officer In-Charge, Naohalia Police Out Post on 10.07.2016. In the FIR, the informant had inter alia alleged that his mother, Bina Chawra was a resident of No. 2 Naohalia Village and she passed away while sleeping on bed after having dinner in the night intervening 09.07.2016 and 10.07.2016. When the informant son went to the house of his mother, he found the neck of his mother half-cut towards left side and there was blood on and around the bed. The informant had named the two accused-appellants herein in the FIR and stated that they had gone to the house where the incident had taken place, to sleep and it was them who had killed the mother of the informant by cutting her neck with a sharp weapon while she was sleeping.

3. On receipt of the FIR [Ext.-2], the In-Charge, Naohalia Police Out Post received the same vide Naohalia Police Out Post General Diary Entry no. 182 dated 10.07.2016 and forwarded the original FIR to the Officer In-Charge, Duliajan Police Station for registering a case under proper sections of law. At the same time, Uttam Adhikari [P.W.8], In-Charge, Naohalia Police Out Post & Sub-Inspector of Police took up the investigation of the case. On receipt of the FIR [Ext.-2], the Officer In-Charge, Duliajan Police Station registered the same as Duliajan Police Station Case no. 237/2016 for the offence under Section 302, IPC read with Section 34, IPC and took note of the fact that the In-Charge, Naohalia Police Out Post, Uttam Adhikari [P.W.8], Sub-Inspector of Police had already taken up the investigation.

4. From the evidence/materials on record, it has also emerged that it was at about 12-45 p.m. on 10.07.2016, the I.O. of the case, that is, P.W.8 received an information over phone that the woman named Bina Chawra had been killed. On receipt of the said information over phone, P.W.8 registered the information vide General Diary Entry no. 176 dated 10.07.2016. After making the entry, he along with staff proceeded to the place of occurrence [P.O.], that is, the house of Late Bina Chawra, No. 2 Naohalia Village. At the P.O., the I.O. [P.W.8] found the deadbody of Bina Chawra lying on the floor of the house. The I.O. [P.W.8] drew a Sketch Map of the P.O. [Ext.-4] and also recorded the statements of witnesses. The I.O. [P.W.8] also conducted inquest on the deadbody of the deceased through an Executive Magistrate and the Executive Magistrate prepared an Inquest Report [Ext.-1]. Finding the presence of the two accused persons at the P.O., the I.O. [P.W.8] took them into custody. After sending the deadbody of the deceased to Assam Medical College & Hospital [AMC&H] for post-mortem examination, the I.O. [P.W.8] took both the accused persons to the Naohalia Police Out Post. Thereafter, the son of the deceased, Dipak Chawra [P.W.6] as the informant lodged the written FIR [Ext.-2] at Naohalia Police Out Post. The In-Charge, Naohalia Police Out Post, that is, P.W.8 received the said written FIR [Ext.-2] vide General Diary Entry no. 182 da

                Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                1
                2
                3
                4
                5
                6
                7
                8
                9
                10
                11
                SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                supreme today icon
                logo-black

                An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                Please visit our Training & Support
                Center or Contact Us for assistance

                qr

                Scan Me!

                India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                whatsapp-icon Back to top