IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR, HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Manipur Hockey Represented By Its President - Petitioner
Versus
State Of Manipur Rep. By The Principal By The Principal (Co-Op) And Ors. – Respondents
WA/27/2023, WA/28/2023
Decided On : 26-07-2024
JUDGMENT :
Kardak Ete, J.
We have heard Mr. S. Biswajit, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. H. Prabir Kumar and Mr. A. Kalita, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. A. Khaidem, learned Addl. Senior Government Advocate, Manipur, for the State respondents; Mr. G. N. Sahewalla, learned Senior counsel along with Mr. M. Hemchandra, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. J. Rahman, learned counsels for the respondent No.3.
2. These Writ appeals are transferred from the High Court of Manipur. Since both the Writ Appeals arises from common judgement & order and are identical, the same were taken up and heard together and are disposed of by this common judgment and order.
3. Both these intra Court appeals are directed against the common judgment and order dated 20.07.2022, passed by the learned Single Judge of High Court of Manipur in Writ Petition (C) No.724/2019 and Writ Petition (C) No.916/2019, by which, the learned Single Judge has dismissed the Writ Petition (C) No.916/2019 filed by the appellant and allowed the Writ Petition (C) No.724/2019, filed by the respondent No.3, whereby the learned Single Judge has directed to implement/execute the order dated 22.01.2018, passed by the Secretary (Co-Operation), Government of Manipur and the letter dated 14.01.2019, issued by the Registrar of Societies, Manipur.
4. The issue pertains to the registration of two societies, namely Manipur Hockey (Appellant herein) and Hockey Manipur (Respondent No. 3 herein). The appellant/Manipur Hockey filed the Writ Petition (C) No.916/2019 challenging the Order dated 22.01.2018, passed by the Secretary (Co-Operation), Government of Manipur and the letter dated 14.01.2019, issued by the Registrar of Societies, Manipur, by which appellant has been directed to change its name and alter the memorandum. The respondent No.3/Hockey Manipur has filed the Writ Petition (C) No.724/2019 for implementation of same order dated 22.01.2018, passed by the Secretary (Co-Operation), Government of Manipur and the letter dated 14.01.2019, issued by the Registrar of Societies, Manipur.
5. The case projected by the appellant/Manipur Hockey is that pursuant to the decision taken in the meeting held on 06.10.2009 and after discussing and deliberating on the issue and in view of the advice given by the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) to the Manipur Olympic Association (MOA) to follow the policy of one game one association, the members of the meeting resolved to form an association under the name and style of Manipur Hockey for not only uplifting the game of hockey in the State of Manipur, but also for the sake and interest of the players, on account of the mismanagement by the members administering the sport in the State of Manipur. After formation of Manipur Hockey, it approached Hockey India, which is the apex body of the game in the country, for its affiliation with them. Thereafter, after taking into account the credentials of the members of Manipur Hockey, who are managing the affairs of hockey in the State of Manipur, granted affiliation of Manipur Hockey to Hockey India with effect from 22.10.2009 by the President of Hockey India. In the said letter, Manipur Hockey was also requested to get itself registered under the Societies Registration Act within six months and deposit the required affiliation fee(s) within three months from the date of the said order.
6. It is contended that in terms of the resolution taken in the meeting held on 06.10.2009, necessary applications/documents and registration fee(s) required under the provisions of Manipur Societies Registration Act, 1989 ( hereinafter referred to as MSR Act, 1989) and Manipur Societies Registration Rules, 2004 (hereafter as MSR Rules, 2004) were submitted to the Registrar of Cooperative Societies for registration of Manipur Hockey. After completing all formalities and procedures provided by law, the Registrar had issued a notification bearing No.402/M/SR/09 dated 12.11.2009 notifying the registration of Ma
Modern Insulators Ltd. vs. Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd.
Naseem Bano (SMT)vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others
Ram Sarup Gupta (dead) By L. Rs.vs. Bishun Narain Inter College and others
State of Assam vs. Union of India and others
State of Jammu and Kashmir and others vs. Ajay Dogra
Asha vs. Pt. B.D.Sharma University of Health Science and others
Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Private Limited and another vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Babu Verghese & others vs. Bar Council Of Kerala & others
Bhagwati Prasad vs. Chandramaul
Central Coalfields Limited and another vs. SLL-SML (Joint Venture Consortium) and others
Hukam Chand Shyam Lal vs. Union of India and others
K. Thimmappa & others vs. Chairman, Central Board of Directors, State Bank of India and another
Registration of a society under a name that resembles an already registered society violates statutory provisions, necessitating a directive for name change.
Registration of societies must adhere to statutory naming provisions, and conflicting names must not exist at the time of registration.
The Registrar of Societies lacks the authority to cancel registrations of societies under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 without appropriate statutory provisions.
Point of Law : Pre-registration act could not have been made an offence and directed that petitioner/Association shall be treated as having been affiliated to the State Association and consequence o....
No person shall use or continue to use for the purpose of any trade, business, calling or profession, or in the title of any patent, or in any trademark or design, any name or emblem specified in the....
Deregistration under Section 21A of the Act can only be based on specified statutory grounds and not on extraneous considerations. The right to form association cannot be jeopardized based on non-sta....
The court established that the Registrar does not have the authority to transfer cases between Deputy Registrars under the Societies Registration Act, and that prior findings against a party must be ....
The court established that registration of a society with a name identical to an existing society is prohibited under Section 7 of the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960.
Only one sports association may be recognized per discipline under the Kerala Sports Act, and the non-production of necessary documentation invalidates claims for registration.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.