JUDGMENT :

HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI

Heard Mr. H. Das, learned counsel for the revision petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State/respondent.

2. The revision petitioner herein challenges the conviction and sentence vide impugned Judgment and order dated 02/06/2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (FTC) Barpeta, affirming the Judgment of the trial court in Criminal Appeal No. 02/2011, which has been preferred against the Judgment and order dated 20/12/2010, passed by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Barpeta, whereby the revision petitioner was convicted u/s 341/324/506 IPC, and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one month and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-in default further SI for one month u/s 341 IPC. The revision petitioner was also sentenced to undergo SI for two years and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/-in default SI for four months u/s 324 IPC and u/s 506 IPC to undergo SI for one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default SI for three months. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is that an FIR has been lodged by the informant stating inter-alia t