Back
MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
Widunsu, W/o. N. Elia – Appellant
Versus
State of Nagaland, Represented through the Chief Secretary to the Government of Nagaland, Kohima – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Mridul Kumar Kalita, J.
1. Heard Mr. N. Longkumer, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. V. Suokhrie, learned Additional Advocate General, Nagaland and Mr. T. Khezhie, learned counsel for the Respondent No. 5.
2. By invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner herein, namely, Smt. Widunsu, approached this Court impugning the order No. ED/EST/GR-IV/APPT/DEOPEREN/ 11-12/281 dated 22.02.2017 whereby the Respondent No. 5 was appointed to the post of peon at Government Higher Secondary School (GHSS), Jalukie and the approval No. DSE/APPT-PRN/GR-III&IV/19-48/2016/1490 whereby the aforesaid appointment of Respondent No. 5 was approved. The Petitioner has prayed for setting aside the aforesaid appointment order of Respondent No. 5. The Petitioner has also prayed for directing the respondent authorities to appoint her to the said post of Peon at Government Higher Secondary School, Jalukie, on the basis of land ownership, in terms of the agreement dated 02.09.1966 and Notification No. REV/LR-1/95 dated 21.08.2003.
3. The Petitioner has stated in her writ petition that for the purpose of expansion of the township an
The court established that the petitioners had no right to claim appointment against the donated land and were not eligible for appointment under the notification dated 05/03/2018.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that an agreement for appointment on landownership basis must comply with government policies on land acquisition and appointment to Grade-IV posts....
A petitioner must come to court with clean hands and disclose all material facts; failure to do so can result in dismissal of the claim.
Point of Law : Condition of advertisement shall be dispense with, but a fair and transparent eligibility criteria shall be adopted for the appointment with due approval of the Government.
Employment benefits based on historical land agreements are governed by current policy and limited in scope, not perpetuity. Additionally, the judiciary is restricted to the pleadings presented and c....
The appointment of a public servant based on land ownership is valid if made prior to the enactment of a policy limiting such appointments, which does not have retrospective effect.
Landowner employment rights are limited to the original appointee and do not extend to descendants, as per government policy.
Appointment based on landownership was limited to the first landowner, confirming no perpetual employment rights for descendants under constitutional provisions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
