IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH, KOHIMA BENCH
MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA, J.
Smti. Widunsu, W/o. N. Elia - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Nagaland, Represented through the Chief Secretary to the Government of Nagaland, Kohima & Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) No. 316 of 2017
Decided On : 30-05-2023
EMPLOYMENT - Appointment of Peon at Government Higher Secondary School, Jalukie - Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Agreement dated 02.09.1966, Notification No. REV/LR-1/95 dated 21.08.2003, Notification No. LR/6-181/LIT-2015 dated 05.03.2018 - The court examined the validity of the appointment of Respondent No. 5 to the post of Peon, considering the agreement between landowners and the government, which stipulated preference for landowners in government service. The court emphasized the necessity of a fair recruitment process as mandated by the Supreme Court, ruling that appointments cannot be made arbitrarily or without open advertisement, thus influencing the decision to quash the appointment of Respondent No. 5 and direct a proper selection process.
Fact of the Case:
Smt. Widunsu challenged the appointment of Respondent No. 5 as Peon at Government Higher Secondary School, Jalukie, claiming her right based on an agreement from 1966 that favored landowners for government jobs. The petitioner argued that her application was overlooked despite the agreement and a subsequent government notification supporting her claim.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appointment of Respondent No. 5 was made without following a fair recruitment process, violating the principles established by the Supreme Court regarding public employment. The court acknowledged the existence of the agreement but ruled that it did not grant perpetual rights to landowners for government employment without a proper selection process.
Issues: Whether the appointment of Respondent No. 5 violated the agreement between landowners and the government, and whether the petitioner had a legitimate claim to the post based on land ownership and the lack of a fair recruitment process.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that while the agreement provided for preference to landowners, it did not exempt the government from conducting a fair recruitment process. The Supreme Court's ruling in 'State of Orissa v. Mamata Mohanty' was cited to emphasize that all appointments must be made through open advertisement and fair competition, ensuring compliance with Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
Final Decision: The court quashed the appointment of Respondent No. 5 and directed the state to conduct a fair recruitment process for the vacant Peon position, allowing both the petitioner and Respondent No. 5 to participate, while considering age relaxation due to the prolonged litigation.
JUDGMENT :
Mridul Kumar Kalita, J.
1. Heard Mr. N. Longkumer, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. V. Suokhrie, learned Additional Advocate General, Nagaland and Mr. T. Khezhie, learned counsel for the Respondent No. 5.
2. By invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner herein, namely, Smt. Widunsu, approached this Court impugning the order No. ED/EST/GR-IV/APPT/DEOPEREN/ 11-12/281 dated 22.02.2017 whereby the Respondent No. 5 was appointed to the post of peon at Government Higher Secondary School (GHSS), Jalukie and the approval No. DSE/APPT-PRN/GR-III&IV/19-48/2016/1490 whereby the aforesaid appointment of Respondent No. 5 was approved. The Petitioner has prayed for setting aside the aforesaid appointment order of Respondent No. 5. The Petitioner has also prayed for directing the respondent authorities to appoint her to the said post of Peon at Government Higher Secondary School, Jalukie, on the basis of land ownership, in terms of the agreement dated 02.09.1966 and Notification No. REV/LR-1/95 dated 21.08.2003.
3. The Petitioner has stated in her writ petition that for the purpose of expansion of the township and for setting up of the District Administrative Headquarters at Jalukie, under Peren District of Nagaland, a vast land was acquired by the Government of Nagaland through district administration from Jalukie village (erstwhile Zalikie village) free of cost. In lieu of the donation of the land, an agreement dated 02.09.1966 was executed between the land owners and the Government laying down certain conditions. Condition No. 4 of the said agreement is reproduced herein below:-
4. The Petitioner further contends that in order to uphold and safeguard the agreement entered into between the land owners and the Government of Nagaland, a Notification bearing No. REV/LR-1/95, dated Peren, the 21st August, 2003 was notified, which is reproduced herein below:-
| “GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER : PEREN NOTIFICATION | ||
|
| Dt. Peren the 21st Aug’03 | |
| NO REV/LR-1/95 This is for General information to all concerned department under Peren Sub-Division that as per the written agreement made between the land owner of Jalukie Old Village and the government of Nagaland at SL No. 4 that first preference shall be given to the land owners for appointment to the post of Grade IV staff and special preference shall be given to the land owners in allocating of small contract works etc. Hence, all the Heads of Deptts/Officers are hereby requested to safe guard the interest of the land owners who had donated their land to the Govt. for establishments of Admn.(Hqs) while considering the above said appointments/allocation of contract works etc. | ||
|
| Sd/- ZENEITUO Addl. Deputy Commissioner Peren” | |
5. The case of the Petitioner, in brief, is that she is a permanent resident of Jalukie ‘B’ Village, under Peren District of Nagaland and a genuine land owner and had applied for appointment to a vacant post of Peon at Government Higher Secondary School, Jalukie, on land ownership basis, which became vacant due to voluntary retirement of Sri Hungambo, Peon, Government Higher Secondary School, Jalukie. The Petitioner further contends that in support of her application, the Jalukie Students Union had also written to the Minister of the concerned department to consider the case of the petitioner on land ownership basis in light of the aforementioned agreement dated 02.09.1966.
6. Petitioner further contends that against the aforementioned vacant post of Peon, three applications were received by the department including that of the petitioner’s, however,
State of Orissa v. Mamata Mohanty
Delhi Development Horticulture Employees' Union v. Delhi Admn.
State of Haryana v. Piara Singh
Excise Supdt. v. K.B.N. Visweshwara Rao
Arun Tewari v. Zila Mansavi Shikshak Sangh
Binod Kumar Gupta v. Ram Ashray Mahoto
National Fertilizers Ltd. v. Somvir Singh
Telecom District Manager v. Keshab Deb
The court established that the petitioners had no right to claim appointment against the donated land and were not eligible for appointment under the notification dated 05/03/2018.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that an agreement for appointment on landownership basis must comply with government policies on land acquisition and appointment to Grade-IV posts....
A petitioner must come to court with clean hands and disclose all material facts; failure to do so can result in dismissal of the claim.
Point of Law : Condition of advertisement shall be dispense with, but a fair and transparent eligibility criteria shall be adopted for the appointment with due approval of the Government.
Employment benefits based on historical land agreements are governed by current policy and limited in scope, not perpetuity. Additionally, the judiciary is restricted to the pleadings presented and c....
The appointment of a public servant based on land ownership is valid if made prior to the enactment of a policy limiting such appointments, which does not have retrospective effect.
Landowner employment rights are limited to the original appointee and do not extend to descendants, as per government policy.
Appointment based on landownership was limited to the first landowner, confirming no perpetual employment rights for descendants under constitutional provisions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.