IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
KAKHETO SEMA, J.
Shri Kahoshe Chishi, S/O Nikuto – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Nagaland And Ors – Respondent
WP(C) 309 of 2021, WP(C) 250 of 2021, WP(C) 335 of 2021, WP(C) 336 of 2021
Decided on : 04-09-2023
Landownership - Appointment to Grade-IV post - Notification dated 05/03/2018 - Conditions 2, 3(b), 3(c)
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, descendants of the landowner, sought appointment to Grade-IV posts at a Government High School in Nagaland on the basis of landownership. The land was donated for the establishment of the school, subsequently taken over by the Government.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioners had no right to claim appointment against the land donated by the original owner. The court also held that the petitioners were not eligible for appointment under the conditions of the notification dated 05/03/2018.
Issues: Whether the petitioners had a right to claim appointment against the donated land and whether they were eligible for appointment under the notification dated 05/03/2018.
Ratio Decidendi: The land was donated unconditionally for the establishment of the school, and no agreement existed between the landowner and the Government for appointment in lieu of the land. The court interpreted the conditions of the notification dated 05/03/2018 to determine the eligibility of the petitioners for appointment.
Final Decision: The court dismissed all the writ petitions, finding no merit to allow them.
JUDGMENT
Heard Mr. I. Apok Pongener, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Livika, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents.
2. All the writ petitions, has been filed by the petitioners, on the same set of facts, seeking for appointment to Grade-IV post, at Government High School, Sapotimi, district-Zunheboto, Nagaland, on the basis of landownership. The writ petitions are therefore disposed of by this common judgment and order.
3. The pleadings in W.P.(C) No. 309/2021, is referred to, for this judgment.
4. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 309/2021 hails from Sapotimi village, in the district of Zunheboto, Nagaland. The petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the State respondents to consider the appointment of the petitioner to the vacant post of Lady Hostel Attendant, at Government High School, Sapotimi, on landownership basis.
5. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 250/2021 hails from Sapotimi village, in the district of Zunheboto, Nagaland. The petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the State respondents to consider the appointment of the petitioner to the vacant post of Chowkidar, at Government High School, Sapotimi, on landownership basis.
6. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 335/2021 hails from Sapotimi village, in the district of Zunheboto, Nagaland. The petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the State respondents to consider the appointment of the petitioner to the vacant post of Peon, at Government High School, Sapotimi, on landownership basis.
7. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 336/2021 hails from Sapotimi village, in the district of Zunheboto, Nagaland. The petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the State respondents to consider the appointment of the petitioner to the vacant post of Helper Carpentry Instructor (HCI), at Government High School, Sapotimi, on landownership basis.
8. The case in a nutshell, as submitted by Mr. I. Apok Pongener, the learned counsel for the petitioners is that, all the petitioners are the descendants of late Khakhu Chishi of Sapotimi village. Late Khakhu Chishi sometime in the year 1920 purchased a portion of the jhum land from one Yimsen Jamir of Longsa village for a sum of Rs. 40/-(Rupees Forty) only. In the year 1953, a Primary School was established, by the village, on the land purchased by late Khakhu Chishi. The School was taken over by the Government and up-graded to Government Middle School in the year 1965, thereafter in the year 2016, the School was again up-graded to Government High School. Mr. I. Apok Pongener submits that the land where the present Government High School Sapotimi is located belongs to the Chishi clan which was originally donated for establishing the Primary School. The learned counsel for the petitioners also submits that a dispute arose over the land between the Chishi clan and the Chophi clan of the village which dragged on for quite some time, but was resolved in favour of the Chishi clan, by the D.B customary court, Suruhoto, Nagaland, by the settlement order dated 14/12/2019. It is submitted that no appeal has been preferred against the settlement order thereby establishing the rights of the Chishi clan on the land in question. The learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that persons from the other clans in the village have wrongly enjoyed the benefits of appointment from the Government on the basis of landownership, but no members from the Chishi clan has ever been appointed nor has enjoyed any privilege, against the School, despite being the lawful owners of the land.
9. The learned counsel for the petitioners also submits that, being the lawful owners of the land, the petitioners had applied for the different posts of Lady Hostel Attendant, Chowkidar, Peon and Helper Carpentry Instructor (HCI) against the School, which had fallen vacant due to the non extension of service of the adhoc employees and the death of the incumbent chowkidar. The applications submitted by the petitioners was forwarded b
Commissioner of Expenditure Tax Andhra Pradesh -versus-PVG Raju Rajah of Vizianagaram
The court established that the petitioners had no right to claim appointment against the donated land and were not eligible for appointment under the notification dated 05/03/2018.
Point of Law : Condition of advertisement shall be dispense with, but a fair and transparent eligibility criteria shall be adopted for the appointment with due approval of the Government.
The court established that agreements favoring landowners for government employment do not negate the requirement for a fair and transparent recruitment process, as mandated by constitutional provisi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that an agreement for appointment on landownership basis must comply with government policies on land acquisition and appointment to Grade-IV posts....
The court affirmed that government employment based on landownership is not guaranteed perpetually and must adhere to existing policies on vacancies.
Employment benefits based on historical land agreements are governed by current policy and limited in scope, not perpetuity. Additionally, the judiciary is restricted to the pleadings presented and c....
A petitioner must come to court with clean hands and disclose all material facts; failure to do so can result in dismissal of the claim.
Appointment based on landownership was limited to the first landowner, confirming no perpetual employment rights for descendants under constitutional provisions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.