IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J.
Abdul Bareque Miah, S/o. Lt. Mahim Uddin Sarkar - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Assam, Through the Comm. and Secy. to the Govt. of Assam, Education (Higher) Deptt. & Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) No. 2826 of 2019
Decided On : 01-08-2024
Provincialization - Principal Service - Assam Venture Educational Institutions (Provincialization of Services) Act, 2011; Assam Education (Provincialization of Services of Teachers and Re-organization of Educational Institutions) Act, 2017 - The Court analyzed the qualifications required for provincialization under the Acts, concluding that the petitioner did not meet the necessary UGC norms at the relevant times, thus denying his claim for provincialization.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought provincialization of his service as Principal of South Salmara College, claiming he met UGC qualifications based on a 1987 relaxation notification. His name was excluded from provincialization lists under the Assam Venture Educational Institutions Act, 2011, due to not meeting qualifications.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the petitioner did not possess the required UGC qualifications at the time of his appointment or during the provincialization process, thus justifying his exclusion from the provincialization under the 2011 Act and later under the 2017 Act.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to provincialization of his service as Principal under the Assam Venture Educational Institutions Act, 2011, and subsequently under the Assam Education Act, 2017, given his qualifications.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the qualifications required for provincialization must be those applicable at the time of consideration, and since the petitioner did not meet these qualifications, he was not entitled to provincialization.
Result: The petition was disposed of with directions for consideration of the petitioner's case for provincialization as a tutor under the Assam Education Act, 2017.
JUDGMENT :
N. Unni Krishnan Nair, J.
Heard Mr. I.H. Saikia, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Gogoi, learned standing counsel, Higher Education Department; Mr. B. Gogoi, learned standing counsel, Finance Department; Mr. P.J. Phukan, learned standing counsel, Gauhati University; and Mr. A. Chamuah, learned standing counsel, University Grants Commission(UGC); appearing on behalf of their respective respondents.
2. The petitioner, in the present proceeding, has prayed for a direction upon the respondent authorities to provincialize his service as a Principal of South Salmara College with effect from the date the other teaching and non-teaching staff of the said College were so provincialized i.e. w.e.f. 14.08.2013, along with all consequential benefits. The petitioner has also prayed for a declaration that he was qualified to hold the post of Principal of the said College since the date of his initial appointment i.e. w.e.f. 08.08.1988, in terms of the University Grants Commission(UGC) regulation as in force read with the relaxation as provided in the matter of qualification by the State Government vide a Notification, dated 05.12.1987.
3. As projected in the writ petition, a Governing Body of South Salmara College was constituted in the year 1986. The said Governing Body adopted a resolution on 06.08.1988, to start the first year TDC classes in the said College with effect from the academic session 1988-89. In the said meeting, a further resolution was adopted to appoint the petitioner, herein, as the Principal of South Salmara College along with 9(nine) other teaching staff. Accordingly, the appointment order was issued to the petitioner, appointing him as the Principal of the said College and thereafter, the petitioner joined his service in South Salmara College.
It is to be noted that the petitioner had completed his MA Degree in Economics in the year 1983 with 50.23% marks. The petitioner on joining the post of Principal in the South Salmara College, initiated steps for receiving permission to start the Degree College from the Gauhati University and accordingly, on receiving such permission; the Degree courses were started in the said College from the academic session 1988-89. Thereafter, on further processing being made in the matter; the Government of Assam in the Education Department, vide Notification, dated 27.09.1999, granted concurrence to start the first year TDC classes in the said College with effect from the academic session 1988-89. The Gauhati University granted temporary affiliation upto TDC Part II(Arts) [General Course] to the said College for the academic session 2000-01. The said temporary affiliation was also renewed by the Gauhati University from time to time. The South Salmara College was also granted permission to start TDC(Arts) [Major Course] in Assamese and the same was also granted affiliation by the Gauhati University. The said College was, thereafter, granted permanent affiliation by the Gauhati University vide resolutions, dated 30.07.2010 and 09.07.2011.
The petitioner, herein, contends that being a “venture educational institution”, the South Salmara College was extended, by the authorities in the Education Department with financial assistance from time to time. The petitioner further contends that by grant of such financial assistance which was also extended to him; the respondent authorities had recognized that he had the requisite qualification to hold the post of Principal of South Salmara College.
Upon enactment of the Assam Venture Educational Institutions (Provincialization of Services) Act, 2011, and the said College being also brought within the purview of the said Act; the petitioner submitted the particulars of the teaching and non-teaching staff working in the College, on 15.12.2011, in the format so specified for the purpose. However, on a consideration of the particulars so submitted, in the list that was so published of the serving teachers of the
Retrospective application of cut-off dates in legislation violating vested rights is unconstitutional under Article 14; tutors as government servants are entitled to equal treatment with regular pay ....
Provincialisation of services under the Assam Venture Institutions Act requires compliance with statutory procedures, and cannot be deemed without a final decision from the State Government, especial....
Beneficial legislation for provincialisation of service must be interpreted to include employees who have rendered continuous service from their initial appointment, even if they acquired the requisi....
The main legal point established is that the petitioner's case for provincialisation under the Act of 2011 did not attain finality as it was not considered and approved by the Government in accordanc....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.