IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
MANISH CHOUDHURY, KAUSHIK GOSWAMI, JJ.
Jogen Munda - Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam - Respondent
Criminal Appeal [Jail] No. 44 Of 2022
Decided On : 12-08-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the trial and charges (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. evaluation of evidence and credibility of witnesses (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 22 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 4. distinction between murder and culpable homicide (Para 33 , 34 , 40) |
| 5. evaluating the factors of provocation in the homicide case. (Para 41) |
| 6. final judgment and orders issued (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
JUDGMENT :
[Manish Choudhury, J.]
The present criminal appeal from Jail under Section 383 , Code of Criminal Procedure [CrPC], 1973 [‘CrPC’ and/or ‘Code’] is directed against a Judgment and Order dated 23.02.2022 passed by the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Sonitpur at Tezpur in Sessions Case no. 23 of 2018. In the trial of Sessions Case no. 23 of 2018, the accused-appellant faced a charge of patricide and after conclusion of the trial, the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Sonitpur at Tezpur [‘the trial court’, for short] finding him guilty for the offence of murder under Section 300 , INDIAN PENAL CODE [IPC], has sentenced him under Section 302 , IPC to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for another 3 [three] months. The learned trial court has observed that the period of detention, if any, already undergone by the accused during the course of investigation, enquiry or trial, shall be set off against the terms of imprisonment as per the provisions of Section 428 , CrPC.
2. The investigation was set into motion on institution of a First Information Report [FIR] by one Abdul Hasim [P.W.4] as the informant, before the Officer In-Charge, Dhekiajuli Polilce Station on 12.04.2016. In the FIR, the informant stated that at around 06-30 p.m. on 11.04.2016, his fellow villager, Chanika Munda [the deceased] was assaulted to death by his own son, Jogen Munda [the accused]. On receipt of the FIR [Ext.-3], Officer In-Charge, Dhekiajuli Police Station registered the FIR as Dhekiajuli Police Station Case no. 206/2016 for the offence under Section 302 , IPC.
3. After registration of the case, the investigation was entrusted to one Chandra Kanta Bhuyan [P.W.9], a Sub-Inspector of Police attached to Dhekiajuli Police Station. On being so entrusted, the I.O. [P.W.9] visited the place of occurrence [P.O.], that is, the house of the deceased and the accused situate at Village – Palashbasti. On going there, the I.O. [P.W.9] found the deadbody of Chanika Munda lying there which was identified by one Bhola Tanti. At the place of occurrence [P.O.], the I.O. found one siprang and the said siprang was seized vide a Seizure List, Ext.-1 in presence of witnesses including Thuma Orang [P.W.-3] and Fajar Ali Ahmed [P.W.5]. The I.O. [P.W.9] also held the inquest proceeding on the deadbody of the deceased at the P.O. by Jayanta Sarkar [P.W.10], Circle Officer, Dhekiajuli Circle. P.W.10, that is, the Circle Officer, Dhekiajuli Circle after completing the inquest on the deadbody of the deceased, recorded his findings in an Inquest Report [Ext.-2]. After completion of the inquest proceeding, the deadbody was forwarded to Kanaklata Civil Hospital, Tezpur for post-mortem examination on 12.04.2016 itself. The post-mortem on the deadbody of the deceased was performed at Kanaklata Civil Hospital, Tezpur at around 03-00 p.m. on 12.04.2016 by Dr. Ranjan Kumar Mahanta [P.W.8], who was serving as the Medical & Health Officer - I in the Hospital on 12.04.2016. The Autopsy Doctor [P.W.8] thereafter, submitted a Post-Mortem Examination [PME] Report [Ext.-4] recording his findings therein. The I.O. [P.W.10] had, in the meantime, prepared a Sketch-Map of the P.O. [Ext.-5] and recorded statements of the witnesses available at the P.O.
4. As the I.O. [P.W.9] did not find the accused in his house, the I.O. made searches for him [the accused]. On receiving an information that the accused was hiding himself in the house of Thuma Orang
V.K. Mishra and another vs. State of Uttarakhand and another
Thangaiya vs. State of Tamil Nadu
The court ruled that the offence committed was culpable homicide not amounting to murder due to mutual provocation and a sudden fight, thus altering the conviction.
The court ruled that solitary eyewitness testimony can suffice for conviction in murder cases, especially when corroborated by medical evidence. The culpable act did not fall under provocation except....
Culpable homicide may be reduced to lesser charges under Exception 4 of Section 300 IPC when death occurs due to injuries inflicted during a sudden fight without premeditation.
The court determined that the accused's actions constituted culpable homicide not amounting to murder due to the absence of premeditation and the nature of the altercation, altering the conviction fr....
If intention of accused was limited to infliction of a bodily injury sufficient to cause death in ordinary course of nature and did not extend to intention of causing death, offence would be murder.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between culpable homicide and murder under the Indian Penal Code, and the assessment of the accused's knowledge and intention in....
Conviction altered from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, as the act was done in the heat of passion without premeditation during a sudden quarrel.
The distinction between murder and culpable homicide hinges on intention and circumstances, with the court applying Exception-4 of Section 300 IPC in cases of sudden quarrel.
Culpable homicide may be reduced to a lesser charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder if committed in the heat of passion during a sudden quarrel without premeditation, as per Exception 4 ....
The appellants were convicted for culpable homicide not amounting to murder, as the assault occurred without premeditation during a sudden quarrel, with shared common intention.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.