SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 2175

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MANISH CHOUDHURY, MARLI VANKUNG, JJ.
Dhan Gowala, Sonitpur – Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam, represented by the Public Prosecutor, Assam – Respondent 
Criminal Appeal (Jail) no. 32 of 2020
Decided On : 04-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ms. B. Chowdhury, Amicus Curiae
For the Respondent: Ms. B. Bhuyan, Senior Counsel & Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, Ms. R. Das, Adv.

The court ruled that solitary eyewitness testimony can suffice for conviction in murder cases, especially when corroborated by medical evidence. The culpable act did not fall under provocation exceptions.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Section 302 - Criminal Appeal against conviction for murder - The Trial Court convicted the appellant for murder, sentencing him to life imprisonment and a fine, based on evidence of an eyewitness and corroborating medical testimony - The appellant's defense raised issues regarding the non-examination of certain witnesses and the nature of the assault, but the court found the testimony reliable and conclusive. (Paras 1, 36, 47)

(B) Evidence - The court emphasized that the quality of evidence, especially from a sole eyewitness, can sustain a conviction even without corroboration from other witnesses. (Paras 28, 40)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was accused of murdering his brother-in-law using a dao after an altercation at a residence. The informant, the mother of the deceased, testified to witnessing the attack. (Paras 2, 36)

Findings of Court:
The court confirmed the conviction based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence of a fatal injury, ruling it as murder as defined under IPC Section 300. (Paras 43, 44)

Issues: The main issues included the reliability of the sole eyewitness's testimony and whether the act constituted murder or culpable homicide not amounting to murder under IPC provisions. (Paras 36, 38)

Ratio Decidendi: The court noted that the immediate use of a dangerous weapon against an unarmed victim indicated intent to kill, thus categorizing the offense as murder rather than falling under any exceptions to IPC Section 300. (Paras 44, 48)

Result: Appeal dismissed, affirming the lower court's conviction and sentence.

Table of Content
1. overview of the case and charges. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. consideration of evidence and testimonies. (Para 8 , 11 , 12)
3. arguments regarding witness credibility and evidence. (Para 9 , 10)
4. prosecution witnesses corroborate the incident details. (Para 25 , 26)
5. singular witness testimony can be sufficient. (Para 28 , 29 , 30)
6. legal principles regarding murder and culpable homicide. (Para 34 , 36 , 40)
7. conclusion regarding the applicability of exception to murder. (Para 44 , 46)
8. final order and directives. (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51)

JUDGMENT :

Manish Choudhury, J.

The instant criminal appeal from Jail is directed against a Judgment & Order dated 08.08.2019 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Biswanath Chariali at Sonitpur, Assam [‘the Trial Court’, for short] in Sessions Case no. 27 of 2018. By the Judgment & Order dated 08.08.2019, the Trial Court has convicted the accused-appellant for the offence under Section 302 , Indian Penal Code [ IPC ] and he has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for another two months.

2. The investigation was set into motion on the basis of a First Information Report [FIR] lodged by the informant, Smti. Tipari Ghatowar [P.W.8] on 20.03.2017 before the Officer In-Charge, Gohpur Police Station reporting about an alleged murder occurred at 06-00 p.m. on that day. In the FIR, the informant had inter alia stated that at around 06-00 p.m. on that day, the accused-appellant, Dhan Gowala killed his brother-in-law, Matilal Ghatowar, aged about 30 years and a resident of Bishnupur Majgaon, by hacking him with a dao. After the assault, the accused-appellant taking advantage of the darkness ran away from the place immediately.

3. On receipt of the FIR, the Officer In-Charge, Gohpur Police Station registered the same as Gohpur Police Station Case no. 56/2017 under Section 302 , Indian Penal Code [ IPC ] on 20.03.2017 itself and entrusted the investigation to one Subaleswar Deka, a Sub-Inspector of Police attached to Gohpur Police Station.

4. On being entrusted with the investigation, the Investigating Officer [I.O.], P.W.10 proceeded to the place of occurrence, that is, the house of the informant, P.W.8. Going there, he found the deadbody of the deceased Matilal Ghatowar lying in the courtyard of the house. The I.O., P.W.10 noticed cut injuries on the neck of the deceased. After examination of the witnesses at the place of occurrence [P.O.], the deadbody of the deceased was brought to the Police Station. The inquest proceeding on the deadbody was done on 21.03.2017 before sending the deadbody for post-mortem examination. The I.O., P.W.10 also drew a Sketch Map of the P.O. vide Ext.-2. As P.W.10 got transferred from Gohpur Police Station, he handed over the case diary to the Officer In-Charge, Gohpur Police Station after collecting the Post-Mortem Examination [PME] Report. The subsequent I.O., P.W.11 was entrusted with the investigation of the case by the Officer In-Charge, Gohpur Police Station on 10.08.2017. The 2nd I.O., P.W.11 arrested the accused-appellant and forwarded him to the Court for remand. After completing the investigation of the case, a charge-sheet under Section 173 [2], CrPC was submitted vide Charge-Sheet no. 07/2018 on 30.01.2018 finding a prima facie case against the accused-appellant for committing the offence of murder which is punishable under Section 302 , IPC .

5. On submission of the Charge-Sheet before the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class [JMFC], Gohpur, Sonitpur, the Court of JMFC, Gohpur, Sonitpur secured the appearance of the accused-appellant from Jail custody on 06.03.2018. As the copies were ready, the same were furnished to the accused-appellant in compliance of the provisions of Section 207 , CrPC. Finding the offence under Section 302 , IPC exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions, the case reco

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top