SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 1823

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Manish Choudhury, Robin Phukan, JJ.
Buwaj Horo - Appellant
Vs.
The State of Assam - Respondent
Criminal Appeal [J] No. 19 of 2020
Decided On: 28-05-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : M. Dutta, Amicus Curiae
For the Respondents:B. Bhuyan, Senior Advocate and Additional Public Prosecutor

The court determined that the accused's actions constituted culpable homicide not amounting to murder due to the absence of premeditation and the nature of the altercation, altering the conviction from Section 302 to Section 304 of the IPC.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 302 and 304 - Murder and culpable homicide not amounting to murder - Accused convicted under Section 302 for murder, sentenced to life imprisonment - Appeal led to re-evaluation of evidence, finding that the act was committed in a sudden fight without premeditation - Conviction altered to Section 304, IPC, with a sentence of 8 years rigorous imprisonment. (Paras 40, 41)

(B) Evidence - Testimony of sole eye-witness - Conviction can be based on the testimony of a sole eye-witness if found trustworthy and consistent - Minor inconsistencies do not undermine the reliability of the core testimony. (Paras 24, 26)

Facts of the case:
The accused, during a quarrel, struck his elder brother with an axe, resulting in instantaneous death. The incident arose from a domestic dispute involving the deceased and his wife, leading to the accused intervening. (Paras 4, 25)

Findings of Court:
The court found the accused guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304, IPC, due to the nature of the incident being a sudden fight without premeditation. (Paras 40, 41)

Issues: The main issues were whether the act constituted murder or culpable homicide and the reliability of the sole eye-witness's testimony. (Paras 28, 24)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the accused acted in the heat of passion during a sudden quarrel, thus falling under Exception 4 of Section 300, IPC, leading to a conviction under Section 304 instead of Section 302. (Paras 40, 41)

Result: Conviction under Section 302 set aside; accused found guilty under Section 304, IPC, sentenced to 8 years rigorous imprisonment.

JUDGMENT :

Manish Choudhury, J.

1. The instant criminal appeal from Jail is preferred against a Judgment dated 17.07.2019 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sonitpur, Tezpur in Sessions Case no. 165/2014. By the Judgment and Order dated 17.07.2019, the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sonitpur, Tezpur has convicted the accused-appellant for the offence of murder under Section 302, Indian Penal Code [IPC] and as a consequence, the accused- appellant has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for another three months. In addition, the accused-appellant has also been convicted on finding him guilty for the offence under Section 448, IPC and for the said offence, he has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. Both the substantive sentences of imprisonment are ordered to run concurrently.

2. We have heard Mr. M. Dutta, learned Amicus Curiae for the accused- appellant; and Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Senior Counsel & Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam assisted by Ms. R. Das, learned counsel for the respondent State of Assam.

3. The case, Sessions Case no. 165/2014 arose out of Tezpur Police Station Case no. 464/2014 and G.R. Case no. 936/2014. The crime case, Tezpur Police Station Case no. 464/2014 came to be registered on 24.04.2014 pursuant to lodging of a First Information Report [FIR] by the informant, Ms. Yappi Horo, wife of Late Mato Horo on 24.04.2014 before the In-Charge, Borghat Out Post under Tezpur Police Station. On receipt of the FIR, the In-Charge, Borghat Out Post after registering the same vide Borghat Out Post General Diary Entry No. 370 dated 24.04.2014, forwarded the FIR to the Officer In-Charge, Tezpur Police Station for registering a case under proper sections of law. At the same time, the investigation of the case was taken up by the In-Charge, Borghat Out Post. On receipt of the FIR, the Officer In-Charge, Tezpur Police Station registered the FIR as Tezpur Police Station Case no. 464/2014 under Section 302, IPC on 24.04.2014.

4. In the FIR, the informant had inter alia stated that when at about 04-00 p.m. on 23.04.2014, an altercation was going on between herself and her husband, Mato Haro over a domestic matter, the accused who was her brother- in-law, trespassed into their house. It was alleged that when, at first, the accused tried to assault her, her husband tried to resist the accused. The accused then picked up an axe, which her husband kept in the courtyard after cutting firewood, and assaulted her husband by striking a blow with the axe. According to the informant, her husband died instantaneously and after committing the act, the accused fled from the place of occurrence.

5. After investigating into the case, that is, Tezpur Police Station Case no. 464/2014 [corresponding G.R. Case no. 936/2014], the Investigating Officer [I.O.] of the case submitted a charge sheet under Section 173[2], CrPC vide Charge Sheet no. 214/2014 dated 23.05.2014 finding a prima facie case established against the accused for the offence under Section 302, IPC. On submission of the Charge Sheet, the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sonitpur, Tezpur as the committal court secured the appearance of the accused who was taken into custody on the date of the incident, that is, on 23.04.2014 itself, from Jail custody on 17.07.2014. As the copies were ready, the same were furnished to the accused as per the provisions of Section 207, CrPC. Finding the offence under Section 302, IPC exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions, the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tezpur by an Order of Commitment dated 17.07.2014 committed the case records of G.R. Case no. 936/2014 to the Court of Sessions, Sonitpur, Tezpur for trial. The learned Public Prosecutor was notified accordingly and the accused was directed to be produced from Jail custody before

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top